NGSA Social Studies study materials
NGSA Social Studies study resources

The Name on the Community Centre: 1763 or 1823?

NGSA Social Studies · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Name on the Community Centre: 1763 or 1823?

A community group in a Berbice River village has raised $400,000 towards a new community centre and must choose a name by the end of the month. Half the members want 'Cuffy Centre'; the other half want 'Quamina Centre'. At the launch, a visiting speaker praises 'these two great men who led fights for freedom in Berbice'. An elder corrects him, saying one of the two fought in a different county. The group also has an old concrete plaque, found near the river, inscribed '1834 - Freedom'. One member argues that the true freedom year is 1838 and that the plaque is wrong. The group has no librarian, one photocopy of a page from an old school textbook, and a smartphone. They plan to write a short history for the centre's wall and do not want to print something they cannot defend.

1. Correct the speaker's statement. Identify each man, where and roughly when he acted, and say which name fits this centre.

Read the worked answer

The speaker has merged two events in two different counties.

  • Cuffy was an enslaved man on Plantation Lilienburg on the Berbice River. In February 1763 he led a rising that spread along the river; for months the rebels controlled much of Berbice and Cuffy was styled governor before the revolt was crushed.
  • Quamina, a deacon, with Jack Gladstone, led the much larger 1823 revolt in Demerara, beginning at Plantation Success on the East Coast - not in Berbice.

Because the centre is in a Berbice river village, 'Cuffy Centre' is the accurate local link. 'Quamina Centre' would tie a Demerara event to a Berbice place.

The distinction is not fussiness. The wall text will teach children where the events happened, and a wrong county in a permanent inscription is repeated for years.

2. The plaque says 1834; a member says the real freedom year is 1838. Explain both dates and advise what the wall text should say.

Read the worked answer

Both dates are real and they mark different things.

  • 1834: the Abolition Act was passed in 1833 and took effect on 1 August 1834. Slavery as a legal status ended - but the formerly enslaved did not become free workers.
  • Apprenticeship: they were bound to their plantations for four years (field workers) or six (domestic workers), still unpaid, still under the planter's control.
  • 1838: apprenticeship was ended, and 1 August 1838 brought full freedom. In the same year the first Indian indentured immigrants arrived, starting a new labour system on the same estates.

So the plaque is not wrong, it is incomplete. The wall text should carry both: '1834 - slavery abolished; 1838 - apprenticeship ended and full freedom won'. A one-line inscription should not be allowed to do the work of a paragraph.

3. The group wants to claim the village stands on a 1763 plantation site. Design a check they could realistically carry out with a phone and a few visits.

Read the worked answer

One plaque and one story are weak evidence. The test is whether independent sources agree.

  1. Names first. 1763 plantation names on the Berbice River are recorded, and Lilienburg is the best known. Find whether the village's old name appears on that list.
  2. Maps and records. Ask the National Archives of Guyana for Dutch and early British estate maps and land records for the area.
  3. Physical traces. Look for brick foundations, drainage trenches, cemetery stones or a mill base, and record their positions with the phone's location and photographs.
  4. Oral history, collected separately from several elderly residents, not one.
  5. A specialist check - the University of Guyana history department or the National Trust - on the photocopied page and whatever is found.

If the sources agree, write 'the village is believed to stand on…'. If only one source supports it, say so plainly rather than printing a fact.