Triage Judgment From a Discharge Instruction Sheet
A triage nurse takes a call using the discharge packet given to a patient after abdominal surgery. The relevant paragraph reads:
"Expect some pinkness along the incision line for the first week; this is normal healing, not infection. Clear or slightly blood-tinged drainage that dries to a thin crust is also expected. Call the clinic the same day if you see redness that spreads beyond a finger's width from the incision, skin that feels hot to the touch, drainage that is thick, cloudy, or foul-smelling, or a fever above 101.5°F. Do not apply lotions, powders, or over-the-counter antibiotic ointments to the site unless a clinician tells you to. Shower after 48 hours; do not soak in a tub or swim for two weeks."
At 9 p.m. on post-operative day 5, the patient says: "The edge of my scar looks a little pink and there's a little clear fluid on the bandage. Also, I put some antibiotic cream on it this morning because I was worried." The clinic is closed; an on-call clinician is reachable.
1. Sort the patient's three reports (pinkness, clear fluid, antibiotic cream) using only the passage. For each, state whether the passage classifies it as expected, as a call-today trigger, or as something the passage addresses in another way.
Read the worked answer
Pinkness at the edge of the scar - expected. The passage says to "expect some pinkness along the incision line for the first week" and explicitly labels it "normal healing, not infection." Day 5 falls inside that window.
Clear fluid on the bandage - expected. "Clear or slightly blood-tinged drainage that dries to a thin crust is also expected." Clear qualifies directly. Note the qualifier is the character of the drainage, not its presence.
Antibiotic cream - neither expected nor a call-today symptom; it is an instruction the patient did not follow. "Do not apply lotions, powders, or over-the-counter antibiotic ointments to the site unless a clinician tells you to." The cream appears nowhere in the call list, so it is not a symptom trigger.
Method note: the call-today list is a closed set of four specific findings - spreading redness, hot skin, thick/cloudy/foul drainage, fever above 101.5°F. The patient has none of them. But categorizing correctly is not the same as clearing the patient, because the third item is a deviation from instructions, and the sheet says nothing about what that deviation means.
2. The patient asks, "So I don't need to come in, right?" What is the best-supported response, and what would be an overreach?
Read the worked answer
Best-supported response: state what the sheet says, do not convert it into a diagnosis, and route the cream question to the on-call clinician.
A defensible version: "The pinkness and clear fluid are both listed as expected at this stage. You also used antibiotic cream, which your instructions told you not to apply, and the sheet does not tell you what to do if that happens. I'm going to have the on-call clinician speak with you about that."
Why: the reading task is to use the text, not to exceed it. The passage licenses two statements - these findings are expected, and the cream was not supposed to be applied. It does not license "you are fine," because the sheet never claims that absence of the four triggers means absence of complication, and it does not license "you have an infection."
The overreach is answering the question as asked: "right, you don't need to come in." That is a clinical clearance drawn from a document that only lists when to call. Silence in a list is not a guarantee, and treating it as one is the reasoning error the question is built to catch.
3. The writer chose "expect" and "expected" rather than "may occur." What does that word choice accomplish, and what risk does it create?
Read the worked answer
What it accomplishes: "expect" sets a baseline. It tells the patient that pinkness and thin clear drainage are the ordinary course, which prevents 2 a.m. panic calls and, more importantly, prevents the patient from mentally filing every change as alarming. It also sharpens the contrast with the call list: the sheet can then use specific, vivid descriptors - spreading, hot, thick, cloudy, foul - for the findings that do matter. The instruction works by making the abnormal stand out against a calm normal.
The risk: "expect" can be read as "this will happen and only this will happen," so a patient whose incision stays pale may wonder whether something is wrong, and a patient who reads the list as exhaustive may under-report. The passage partially guards against this by defining the call triggers precisely rather than saying "call if anything seems wrong."
Vocabulary-in-context point: in this passage "expected" means consistent with normal healing, not certain to occur. Misreading it as a prediction rather than a permission is the error to avoid.