The Text That Said 'Keep Him Happy'
Sunday, 2:15 a.m. A 41-year-old contractor leaves a Honolulu bar after roughly nine drinks over four hours, gets into his truck, and at 2:26 a.m. hits a parked car 1.2 miles away. His blood draw is 0.19. The investigation produces three documents. First, at 1:20 a.m. the server texted the manager: 'Table 9 guy is wrecked, can I cut him off?' The manager replied: 'Keep him happy, he's with the contractor party, big tab.' Second, the incident log has no entry for that night. Third, training records show the last staff session was three years ago; the server has worked five weeks and there is no written refusal policy. The bar holds an on-premises license, and the manager is the licensee's designated manager for that shift.
1. Who is exposed, and on what theories? Address the licensee, the manager, and the server separately.
Read the worked answer
Licensee - administrative and civil. The liquor commission can act against the license for serving an obviously intoxicated person and for the manager's direction of it; fines and suspension are realistic, and a documented pattern can put the license at risk. The licensee is responsible for its managers' and employees' acts within the scope of their jobs, and the manager's text is the worst fact in the file because it proves knowledge at 1:20 a.m., after which the bar kept serving for roughly 55 minutes.
Civil: Hawaii recognizes commercial-host liability. In Ono v. Applegate the Hawaii Supreme Court allowed a tavern to be held liable to injured third parties for serving a visibly intoxicated patron. The car owner can sue the bar, and the text plus the 0.19 support both breach and causation. Many general liability policies exclude or sublimit liquor liability, so coverage should be checked now, not later.
Manager. The instruction is the central act. Employment consequences are near-certain; administrative and civil exposure follows the licensee but the manager's own conduct is the evidence.
Server. 'My manager told me to' mitigates, it does not immunize. Expect employment action and possible furnishing-related charges.
2. Which records actually matter, and what should happen to them?
Read the worked answer
POS timestamps establish how many drinks, at what pace, and who rang them - nine drinks over four hours with the last ones after 1:20 a.m. is the spine of the case. The texts are discoverable and establish knowledge. The empty incident log is itself evidence: either nobody noticed (a training failure) or the house does not record (a culture failure). Training records and the server's five weeks of experience go to supervision and foreseeability.
Also worth gathering: door records and whether he was cut off earlier, whether anyone offered a ride, the manager's authority on that shift, and any prior complaints about that table or that manager.
What should happen to them: preserve everything and stop casual texting about the incident. Do not 'clean up' the POS, do not delete threads, do not rewrite the log retroactively. Spoliation is discoverable in itself and turns a defensible case into an indefensible one. Route all questions to counsel and brief staff once, in writing, to preserve records and refer inquiries.
3. Name the three changes that would most reduce the chance of a repeat, and explain why each one works.
Read the worked answer
1. A written refusal policy with one non-negotiable rule: any employee may cut off a customer, and no manager may override a cutoff. If a manager disagrees, the drink still is not poured and the disagreement is written down. This is the single change that would have changed this night, because the server did the right thing at 1:20 a.m. and was overruled.
2. Training with records. Every server trained before working alone, an annual refresher, sign-in sheets, and a short review after any incident. Records convert 'we train people' from a claim into evidence and shrink the supervision gap that five weeks of experience represents.
3. A documented refusal and incident log plus a safe-ride protocol. Water, food, taxi on the house, a 911 call for an impaired driver, and a manager sign-off on each entry. Add a late-night limit on doubles and shots and a last-call procedure tied to the county closing time, so judgment does not depend on how big the tab is.