I85PREP
⌘ K
Hawaii PT Jurisprudence study materials
Hawaii PT Jurisprudence study resources

Hawaii PT Jurisprudence: Hawaii Statutes and Administrative Rules Governing Physical Therapy, Licensure, Renewal, and Continuing Competence Requirements

Hawaii PT Jurisprudence · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Hawaii Statutes and Administrative Rules Governing Physical Therapy, Licensure, Renewal, and Continuing Competence Requirements

Domain 1 - Statutes, licensure, renewal, and continuing competence

Hawaii physical therapy practice is governed by HRS chapter 461J and the Board of Physical Therapy rules in HAR title 16, chapter 110. The board sits within DCCA’s Professional and Vocational Licensing Division. The exam tests whether you can trace a license from application through renewal and recognize when practice is unauthorized.

The statutory core

  • HRS 461J creates the board and defines “physical therapy,” “physical therapist,” and “physical therapist assistant.” Practice and title use require a Hawaii license; unlicensed practice is a violation.
  • The board has five members: three PTs, one PTA, and one public member, appointed by the governor. It adopts rules, approves applications, and disciplines licensees.
  • The statute sets qualifications: graduation from an accredited PT or PTA program, good moral character, and passing the NPTE or an equivalent the board requires. Endorsement applicants must hold a current license in another jurisdiction with substantially equivalent requirements; the board may require additional examination or evidence.

Renewal and continuing competence

  • Licenses renew biennially. Renewal requires the fee, a completed application, and proof of continuing education; practice on a lapsed license is unlicensed practice.
  • Hawaii requires 30 contact hours per two-year renewal cycle. Board rules set acceptable categories, caps on self-study, and recordkeeping. Keep certificates for the audit period; CE is not transferable to another licensee.
  • Inactive or retired status, if available, does not permit practice. Restoration after lapse may require late fees and evidence of current competence.

Worked example

A PT licensed in California for six years moves to Honolulu and applies by endorsement. She passed the NPTE, graduated from a CAPTE-accredited program, and holds a current California license. The board verifies education and licensure and may require a Hawaii law-and-rules examination or additional documentation. She may not treat patients until the Hawaii license is issued. Her California CE hours do not satisfy Hawaii’s renewal requirement because CE attaches to the Hawaii license cycle. Reasoning: endorsement substitutes for re-examination only when qualifications are equivalent and the board approves; licensure is not automatic.

Traps

  • Assuming NPTE passage alone authorizes practice.
  • Treating “reciprocity” as automatic; it is board-approved endorsement.
  • Confusing initial licensure requirements with biennial CE.
  • Practicing while an application is pending or after a lapse.
  • Missing that PTA and PT qualification and CE rules differ.