Revising a Persuasive Essay Under a Word Limit
Priya is revising a 495-word persuasive essay for a 500-word limit. Her thesis argues that the school board should move the high school start time from 7:25 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. Paragraph 2 opens, “First, sleep science is clear,” and cites a study of 2,000 teenagers. Midway through that paragraph, she inserted, “Also, the cafeteria’s new salad bar has been popular.” Paragraph 3 begins, “Another reason is safety,” and discusses drowsy driving. Her conclusion restates the thesis word-for-word and adds a new statistic about bus fuel costs. The assignment rubric rewards unity, logical progression, and a conclusion that reinforces rather than introduces ideas. Priya has 12 minutes of class time left to revise.
1. What single revision would most improve the essay’s organization? Explain why.
Read the worked answer
Delete the sentence “Also, the cafeteria’s new salad bar has been popular.” The paragraph’s controlling idea is sleep science; a salad bar does not support the claim that later start times improve sleep or safety. Keeping it would force readers to infer a connection that is not there and would dilute the paragraph’s unity. Because the essay is at 495 words with a 500-word limit, deletion also removes a word-count risk. Moving the sentence to another paragraph would not help: no paragraph in the essay is about cafeteria services. The stronger revision is to cut it rather than to invent a transition, since a transition cannot supply relevance.
2. Priya wants to add one sentence acknowledging that later start times could affect after-school athletics. Where should it go, and how should it be framed?
Read the worked answer
Place the concession after paragraph 3 and before the conclusion. The body paragraphs should first establish the sleep and safety arguments; a counterargument belongs after the case has been made, where it can be answered. A workable sentence: “Some opponents worry that a later start time would shorten after-school practice, but districts that have made the change report adjusting practice schedules without cutting athletic participation.” This acknowledges the objection and rebuts it without weakening the thesis. Putting it in the introduction would blur the thesis; putting it in the conclusion would introduce a new debate after the essay has already closed.
3. Evaluate the transition “Also” at the start of the salad bar sentence. If the sentence were kept, what transition or revision would be needed?
Read the worked answer
“Also” is not the main problem; the sentence’s content is. “Also” signals a parallel supporting point, but the salad bar is not a supporting point for the sleep or safety claims. Even a stronger transition such as “In addition” would only make the irrelevance smoother. If Priya insisted on keeping the sentence, she would need to create a new paragraph about facilities and explain how cafeteria changes relate to start times-an argument the essay does not make and cannot support in the remaining five words. The best judgment is to delete rather than to repair the transition.