A supervisor reports an unresolved control gap
A fictional Hong Kong food premises has a missing required check in its approved monitoring record. The person performing the daily review cannot establish the relevant conditions for the affected period. A colleague suggests writing that everything was acceptable because no complaint has been received. Another records what is known, identifies the possible affected product interval and promptly brings the issue to the responsible management process. This written case submits no official report and supplies no universal local release criterion. It asks the learner to distinguish an accurate supervisory finding from a fabricated assurance, explain why absence of a complaint does not verify a control and preserve the actual approved corrective-action responsibilities.
1. What finding is supportable?
Read the worked answer
The required control for the stated period is not demonstrated by the available record. No complaint does not establish that the check passed.
2. What should the supervisor do?
Read the worked answer
Accurately report the gap and relevant affected interval, follow the premises’ approved escalation and product-control process and avoid inventing observations or release criteria.