The Hot IPO and the House Fund
You are the responsible officer of Pinecrest Asset Management, a Type 9 licensed corporation. Pinecrest manages Fund A (institutional, 1.5% fee), Fund B (retail, 1.0% fee) and Fund C (Pinecrest's own seed capital, no fee). Nova Health's IPO is 40 times oversubscribed. Pinecrest is allocated 1.2 million shares. The investment team allocates 700,000 to Fund C, 400,000 to Fund A and 100,000 to Fund B because 'Fund C needs performance to attract external money'. The same day, the head of trading executes a cross trade: Fund A sells 200,000 shares of a stock to Fund B at HK$12.50 while the market price is HK$11.90. The trade is not client-initiated. Pinecrest also receives HK$180,000 from Broker X as 'research credits' after directing 60% of Fund A's brokerage to Broker X. Fund A's offering document says it may receive soft-dollar benefits but gives no details. The compliance officer is on leave.
1. Evaluate the IPO allocation across the three funds.
Read the worked answer
IPO allocation. Pinecrest has a conflict between its own seed fund and its clients. The manager owes each fund a duty to act in its best interests and to allocate investment opportunities fairly. Giving 700,000 of the 1.2 million hot IPO shares to Fund C, the proprietary fund, because it 'needs performance' is a clear case of preferring the house account over clients. That is not an objective allocation. A proper policy would allocate by reference to factors such as each fund's order size, mandate, cash available and investment restrictions, and would be applied consistently. Client funds should generally have priority over the manager's own capital. The allocation should be documented and disclosed to clients, and any allocation to a proprietary fund should be approved under the conflicts policy. The RO should reverse the allocation if possible, report to the SFC, and review all IPO allocations. The conduct may breach the Fund Manager Code of Conduct and the manager's fiduciary duties.
2. Evaluate the cross trade between Fund A and Fund B.
Read the worked answer
Cross trade. A cross trade between two funds under the same manager is a conflict. The manager must act in the best interests of both funds and execute at a fair price. Fund A sells to Fund B at HK$12.50 when the market is HK$11.90. That is about 5% above market. It transfers value from Fund B to Fund A and cannot be justified as best execution for Fund B. The trade was not client-initiated, so there is no client instruction to rely on. The manager should have obtained an independent valuation, checked the fund documents for any prohibition, and disclosed the trade to both funds. Cross trades should be at arm's length market price, documented, and monitored. The head of trading should not have executed it without compliance approval. The firm should unwind or compensate Fund B, report the breach, and strengthen pre-trade controls. Depending on the facts, the trade could also raise market misconduct concerns if it created a false or misleading appearance of trading.
3. What should be done about the soft-dollar arrangement and the disclosure?
Read the worked answer
Soft dollars. Research credits are not automatically improper. The Fund Manager Code of Conduct permits soft-dollar benefits only if they are for the benefit of clients, assist in the investment process, and do not relieve the manager of its own expenses. The manager must also seek best execution. Here, the HK$180,000 payment and the direction of 60% of Fund A's brokerage to Broker X suggest that the arrangement may be driving order flow rather than execution quality. The manager must assess whether the credits are eligible research, whether Broker X's execution is competitive, and whether the arrangement is consistent with Fund A's documents. The offering document's generic statement that the fund 'may receive soft-dollar benefits' is not adequate disclosure; clients should be told the nature and approximate value of the benefits and the conflicts. The manager should disclose the arrangement in the fund's periodic reports, obtain client consent where required, and stop the arrangement if it cannot be justified. The RO should review all soft-dollar arrangements across the funds.