HKSI Paper 6 study materials
HKSI Paper 6 study resources

HKSI Paper 6: Athlete Support and Development

HKSI Paper 6 · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Athlete Support and Development

This domain tests whether you can describe a coherent pathway from recruitment to elite performance and out the other side - and whether you know who is responsible at each stage. Questions typically probe the stages of long-term athlete development (LTAD), the difference between chronological and developmental age, the services wrapped around an athlete, and the transitions athletes most often fail at.

The pathway

  • Foundation / FUNdamentals - broad movement literacy, fun, multiple sports. The priority is physical literacy, not results.
  • Learn to Train / Train to Train - the widest window for skill acquisition; volume rises but stays general and varied.
  • Train to Compete / Train to Win - event-specific loading, individualised programmes, full sports science support.
  • Active for Life - retention, transition, masters sport, coaching and volunteering pathways.

The LTAD model is a planning heuristic, not a selection instrument. It is keyed to developmental age - commonly estimated from peak height velocity (PHV) - not birthday. Two children in one squad can be four years apart biologically; the relative age effect (Q1-born athletes over-represented in youth squads) is the standard evidence.

Who supports the athlete

An integrated support team: coach, strength and conditioning, physiotherapy, medicine, nutrition, psychology, performance analysis, and a lifestyle or dual-career adviser. Institute-level support (in Hong Kong, the Hong Kong Sports Institute) typically adds accommodation, education liaison, medical cover, scholarships and career-transition help. Support should follow an assessed need, not be used as a reward for results.

Worked example

A 14-year-old swimmer ranked second nationally in her age group is training 18 hours a week and has just entered a growth spurt; the club proposes moving her to the senior squad next month. Reasoning: PHV timing predicts a temporary dip in coordination and a rise in injury risk; a national age-group ranking partly reflects relative age, not senior potential; senior squad volume would add load exactly when tendons and joints are adapting. The defensible answer is to keep her in the Train-to-Train stage, cap weekly volume, add landing and trunk-control work, protect sleep and schooling, and review at the end of the growth spurt.

Traps that cost marks

  • Equating junior ranking with senior potential.
  • Treating LTAD stages as fixed ages rather than reference points.
  • Recommending early specialisation and year-round single-sport training.
  • Building a plan that ignores education, family and wellbeing.