Clinic Fit-Out: Power, Port and Licence Budget Conflicts
Northgate Clinic is fitting Wi-Fi into a three-floor building with 24 APs: 18 × AP4050DN dual-band indoor APs for wards and 6 × AP7060DN Wi-Fi 6 APs for imaging and consultation suites. All 24 APs are to be cabled to a single 24-port PoE switch whose datasheet quotes a 370 W total PoE budget and 30 W per port. The existing AC6605 is in the core and holds a licence for 16 APs. The integrator's plan says "PoE is fine because 12.95 W × 18 plus 25.5 W × 6 = 386 W, close enough to 370 W, and the switch will just prioritise". The clinic also wants the imaging suite APs to run at full capability because a wireless ultrasound cart is used there. No spare budget exists for a second AC.
1. Show why the PoE plan is wrong, using PSE-side numbers, and predict the observable symptoms at the APs and on the AC.
Read the worked answer
The integrator computed at the PD (powered device) and then ignored the shortfall. A PSE reserves power at the class maximum, not at the measured draw:
| AP | Count | PD draw | Class | PSE reservation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AP4050DN | 18 | 12.95 W | 3 | 15.4 W → 277.2 W |
| AP7060DN | 6 | 25.5 W | 4 | 30.0 W → 180.0 W |
| Total | 24 | 457.2 W |
Even the PD-side arithmetic (386.1 W) exceeds the 370 W budget; the PSE-side reservation exceeds it by ~87 W. The 30 W per-port figure is fine - the problem is aggregate.
Observable symptoms:
- The switch powers APs in priority/port order until the budget is exhausted; the last APs (or the lowest-priority ports) stay unpowered and never appear on the AC at all - no CAPWAP, no fault record, because the AP is dead.
- If the budget is oversubscribed during a power dip or after a reload, APs may flap: the AC shows repeated online/offline transitions and
display ap allshows state bouncing. - Any AP7060DN that negotiates only 802.3af (for example because LLDP is disabled and the class is misread, or a midspan injector is af) boots in a reduced mode - typically USB disabled and/or the 2.4 GHz radio off or power-reduced - and the AC raises a power-insufficiency alarm. That directly breaks the ultrasound cart requirement.
So the correct reading is: aggregate budget fails, and the per-port class must be verified for the Wi-Fi 6 units.
2. Propose the minimum-cost remedies and state the order in which you would apply them.
Read the worked answer
Constraints: one AC (no budget for another), 24 APs, 370 W, 24 ports. There is no spare port, so a second switch is not purely optional if anything else needs a port.
Ordered remedy plan:
- Split the PoE load. Add a second small PoE switch (or a PoE injector bank) for the 6 × AP7060DN. Removing 180 W of reservation drops the original switch to ~277 W for 18 APs - comfortably inside 370 W. This also gives port headroom. Cheapest reliable fix.
- If a second switch is impossible, downgrade the imaging suite to AP4050DN-class units and accept the loss of Wi-Fi 6 features, or reduce AP count by re-planning coverage. Do not "accept" the 457 W reservation.
- Verify class negotiation for every AP7060DN: confirm LLDP/CDP or 802.3at two-event classification is working and that the port is not capped below 30 W. Set explicit per-port maximum power only where the AP is known to run in reduced mode by design.
- Fix licensing before cutover. The AC supports 16 APs; 24 will attempt to register. The 8 over-licence APs fail to come online even with perfect power. Either purchase the additional 8 AP licences or reduce the deployed AP count - but note that reducing APs to 16 will not meet coverage.
Apply power and licence fixes together before a commissioning test, otherwise you will be debugging two independent failure modes at once.
3. The clinic insists the imaging suite APs run at full capability. What exactly would you verify on the AC and switch, and what would you accept as proof?
Read the worked answer
On the switch:
- Negotiated class and delivered power per port (PoE status output), confirming Class 4 / 802.3at and ~30 W reservation for the AP7060DN ports.
- LLDP or CDP adjacency to each AP; without it, class-based negotiation may still work but power-priority and fine-grained control are lost.
- Port power priority set so imaging-suite ports are highest, protecting them if the budget is ever stressed.
On the AC:
display ap all- all 24 APs online, correct AP types, no repeated state changes.- Power and alarm status per AP: no power-insufficiency or PoE alarm on the imaging APs.
- Radio status per AP: both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz radios up at full configured power, no radio administratively down for power saving.
Accepted proof:
- A 30-minute soak with all 24 APs powered, no AP reboot, no power alarm.
- A throughput and latency test with the ultrasound cart associated to an imaging AP: expected 5 GHz MCS/rate consistent with full-power operation (not a capped low-rate state), no packet loss over 10 minutes, and latency stable.
- A deliberate failure test: pull power from one non-critical AP and confirm the imaging APs are unaffected.
If any imaging AP comes up with a radio disabled or a power alarm, the design has failed regardless of what the port status says - the AP itself is the authority on whether it received enough power.