Renewal Cycle: Unapproved CE and an Unsupervised Apprentice
A Class A master electrician's Iowa license expired on June 30. In the prior renewal cycle he completed 8 hours of an online 'Electrical Business Growth' course from a national marketing company, 4 hours of NFPA 70E arc-flash training from a provider approved by the Electrical Examining Board, and 2 hours of a free webinar hosted by a distributor. He has not completed any code-update hours. He asks you to 'sign off' on his renewal and says the business course should count because it is electrical-related. Separately, he allowed a second-year apprentice to run a 60-foot feeder to a new panel in a commercial warehouse and terminate the equipment grounding conductor while he was at lunch. He says the apprentice 'knows what he's doing' and that the work was inspected afterward by the general contractor.
1. Evaluate the continuing education hours under the education rules. Which hours should count, and what is missing?
Read the worked answer
The 4 hours of NFPA 70E training from a board-approved provider are the strongest candidate to count because the provider is approved and the subject is technical. The 8-hour business-growth course is unlikely to satisfy technical or code-related continuing education requirements; the fact that it is offered by an electrical-related company does not make it approved. The 2-hour distributor webinar is also suspect unless the provider and course are approved and the subject falls within the required categories.
The master electrician appears to lack code-update hours. The education rules specify approved subject areas and hour distributions, and those requirements change, so the correct step is to check the current rule and the board's approved-course list before claiming credit. The contractor should obtain certificates showing provider approval, course title, hours, and date. If the hours are insufficient, he must complete approved courses before renewal or reinstatement. You should not sign off on hours you cannot verify.
2. The license has already expired. What may the master electrician do, and what should he not do, while the renewal or reinstatement is pending?
Read the worked answer
Once the license expires, the master electrician may not perform electrical work or hold himself out as licensed until the board renews or reinstates the license. The licensing rules set the late-renewal and reinstatement procedures, including fees and any additional requirements. He should contact the board promptly, complete the required application and approved continuing education, and pay the applicable fees. He should not advertise, bid, or contract electrical work in the meantime, and he should not ask another licensee to 'cover' his jobs as a workaround.
The contractor should also notify current clients about the status and arrange for a properly licensed person to take responsibility for open projects. If he continues to work, he risks disciplinary action and unlicensed-practice consequences, and the general contractor may also face exposure. The correct answer is to stop work, document the timeline, and follow the board's reinstatement process.
3. How should you respond to the unsupervised apprentice incident, and what records or notifications are appropriate?
Read the worked answer
The apprentice's work on the feeder and equipment grounding conductor while the master was at lunch is a supervision violation under Iowa Code Chapter 103 and the licensing rules. A general contractor's later inspection does not cure the licensing problem. The master electrician should stop similar assignments, determine whether the apprentice was qualified for the task, and arrange for a licensed electrician to review and, if necessary, correct the installation.
The contractor should document the incident, the corrective actions, and any retraining. If the work is already covered or energized, it should be inspected and tested before being placed in service. The contractor should not alter the apprentice's records or backdate supervision. Depending on the facts, self-reporting to the board may be appropriate, especially if the work was concealed or if the apprentice performed work beyond the permitted scope. The response should focus on correcting the installation and preventing recurrence, not on blaming the general contractor.