Class B Bid for an Assisted-Living Fire Alarm
A contractor holding an Iowa Class B master electrician license submits a bid to install a new addressable fire alarm system in a 48-unit assisted-living facility. The facility includes a commercial kitchen, a memory-care wing, and a 12-zone sprinkler monitoring interface. The contractor's proposal says the Class B license 'covers all electrical work under 600 volts' and that a fire alarm is 'low voltage, so no electrical license is needed.' The general contractor wants to award the bid because it is $18,000 below the next bid. The project is in a city with a local fire alarm registration requirement and State Fire Marshal plan review. The contractor has not submitted plans and says the plans can be submitted after rough-in because 'the inspector only needs to see the devices.'
1. Is the contractor's claim about the Class B license correct? Analyze the scope issue and the risk to the general contractor.
Read the worked answer
The claim should not be accepted. Iowa Code Chapter 103 establishes license classes, and a Class B license does not authorize every electrical installation under 600 volts. The statute and board rules define the scope, and a fire alarm system in a commercial assisted-living facility is likely outside a limited Class B scope. 'Low voltage' is not a blanket exemption; fire alarm installation is electrical work and is also life-safety work subject to plan review and inspection.
The general contractor should require written verification from the Electrical Examining Board or the contractor's own license record before awarding the bid. Awarding to a contractor acting outside its license scope can expose the general contractor to stop-work orders, failed inspections, delay in occupancy, and liability if the system is defective. The low bid may be low because the contractor is not accounting for the required supervision, plan review, or licensed subcontractor. The general contractor should also check the local fire alarm registration and the State Fire Marshal review requirements.
2. What should the contractor do if it wants to perform the work? Describe the licensing, plan review, and supervision steps.
Read the worked answer
The contractor should first determine whether its Class B license covers this occupancy and system type. If it does not, the contractor should either decline the work or joint-venture with a properly licensed Class A contractor or a licensed fire alarm contractor acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction. The contractor should not bid and then rely on an unlicensed installer or on the apprentice to perform the work.
The contractor should submit fire alarm plans and calculations for State Fire Marshal and local review before rough-in, obtain the electrical permit, and schedule inspections. Installation should be performed by licensed electricians, with apprentices supervised as required. The contractor should also confirm local registration, insurance, and qualification requirements. If the contractor proceeds without resolving the scope issue, it risks enforcement action and nonpayment. A written scope review before bid day is the practical control.
3. The general contractor asks you to 'look the other way' because the price difference is large. How should you frame the ethical and practical response?
Read the worked answer
The response should be direct: price is not a substitute for licensure. The general contractor is being asked to award a life-safety contract to a bidder who may not be licensed for the scope and who has not submitted plans. That creates a foreseeable risk to residents and to the project schedule. The correct action is to require proof of license scope and plan approval before award, not after installation.
You should document the concern in writing to the general contractor, identify the specific missing approvals, and recommend that the bid be rejected unless the contractor can demonstrate compliance. If the general contractor proceeds anyway, you should not sign off on the installation or certify work you did not verify. The ethical issue is not whether the contractor is a nice person; it is whether the public is protected and whether the work will pass inspection. A lower bid that cannot be lawfully performed is not a real saving.