The Notarized Wishes Form and the Second Wife
A 67-year-old man dies in an Iowa hospital. He was married for 18 months to his second wife, who wants immediate cremation and no viewing. His two adult children from his first marriage want a traditional burial next to their mother. They produce a notarized “My Final Wishes” form the decedent signed eight years ago, before the second marriage, naming his daughter as “the person in charge of my funeral and burial.” The form was witnessed by the daughter’s husband. The wife says she never saw the form and that, as spouse, she has legal priority. The hospital released the body to the wife’s chosen funeral home. The daughter threatens a lawsuit and asks the funeral director to hold the body. The funeral director has a signed cremation authorization from the wife. No court order has been entered. The decedent left no other written disposition document.
1. Rank the competing claims and analyze whether the notarized form changes the spouse’s priority.
Read the worked answer
Iowa’s disposition statute creates a priority order for the right to control funeral and burial arrangements; a surviving spouse generally ranks ahead of adult children when there is no valid written designation. A written designation can change that order if it complies with the statute and is properly executed. Here the form is notarized, which supports validity, but it was witnessed by the daughter’s husband, an interested person, and it predates the second marriage. Those facts create legal arguments about whether the form is valid, whether the later marriage revoked or superseded it, and whether the daughter can rely on it. The funeral director should not make a final legal ruling. The spouse’s priority is the default, but the daughter has asserted a colorable written claim. The safest course is to recognize the dispute, preserve the document, and ask the parties to resolve it by agreement or court order.
2. What should the funeral director do about the wife’s cremation authorization and the daughter’s demand to hold the body?
Read the worked answer
Once the funeral director has notice of a genuine dispute over the legal right to control disposition, proceeding with cremation on the wife’s authorization alone is risky. The director should not cremate while the daughter’s claim is pending unless a court authorizes it or the parties sign a written agreement. The body should be held under proper refrigeration, with identification and chain-of-custody records. The director should tell both parties in writing that disposition is on hold because of competing claims, explain storage arrangements and any fees, and give them a reasonable deadline to obtain a court order. If no agreement is reached, the funeral director may petition a court for instructions or seek guidance from counsel. Good-faith reliance on a spouse’s authorization may provide protection in ordinary cases, but that protection is weaker after the establishment has actual notice of a competing claim.
3. What documentation and communications should the establishment create to protect itself?
Read the worked answer
The file should contain the wife’s cremation authorization, the daughter’s written claim and a copy of the notarized form, a timeline of when each document was received, and notes of all calls and meetings. The funeral director should send written notices to both sides confirming that no disposition will occur until a court order or signed agreement is received, and should state the storage location and any daily or monthly charges. The establishment should not alter the form or pressure either side to sign. It should preserve the body according to policy, confirm identification, and consult counsel about whether to file an interpleader-type petition or a declaratory judgment action. Once a court order is entered, the director should follow it and document the release. Clear, neutral documentation reduces the risk of liability for whichever choice is ultimately made.