The Sash Print
At 23:40, a homeowner returns to find her 71-year-old father unresponsive in the living room of his bungalow and a rear window sash raised. A patrol officer arrives, sees the victim, and climbs through the open window to unlock the front door for paramedics; he later tells you he may have touched the frame. The window is a double-hung wood sash with peeling paint, and there is a smudged latent print on the interior lower-left sash, plus a clean footwear impression in soil below the exterior sill. The homeowner says the window is always locked and that a jewelry box is missing from the bedroom. Temperature is 4°C; light rain began 20 minutes ago. The victim has a blunt-force injury to the left temple; a brass lamp lies nearby. You have one latent print examiner available by phone and a 24-hour lab turnaround.
1. How do you decide whether the latent print on the interior sash is probative, and how do you document the officer's possible contact?
Read the worked answer
First establish the officer's exact movements and contact points through a recorded interview and a written statement, and photograph his hands and shoes. Inspect the sash for overlapping ridge detail, smudging, or distortion consistent with a recent grasp; a print on the interior lower-left sash where a person would lift the sash is consistent with either the officer or an intruder. Collect the entire sash or cut a section only after photographing it in place with a scale and noting the print's location relative to the latch and the officer's described hand placement. Submit it for examination with the officer's elimination prints and palm prints; do not decide probative value yourself. If the print is smudged or partial, state the limitations. The key judgment is that a print is not the intruder's until it is compared and the officer's contact is accounted for.
2. What competing hypotheses explain the raised sash, and what evidence would separate them?
Read the worked answer
Hypotheses: (a) intruder entry through the window; (b) the victim or homeowner opened it earlier; (c) the officer opened or further raised it; (d) the sash was already unlatched and wind or vibration moved it. Separators: the latch condition and whether it shows tool marks or fresh scraping; soil and footwear impressions below the exterior sill compared with the officer's and the victim's shoes; latent prints and DNA on the sash and latch; the officer's statement and radio timeline; interior transfer patterns such as dirt or leaf fragments on the floor and sill; and the homeowner's account of the window's usual state. The missing jewelry is supportive but not determinative. Weather matters: rain began 20 minutes ago and may have altered exterior soil, so photograph and cast the impression before further degradation.
3. Given light rain, what outdoor evidence do you protect first, and how?
Read the worked answer
The footwear impression in soil below the sill is the most perishable outdoor evidence. Photograph it immediately with and without a scale, then cover it with a rigid box or evidence tent rather than plastic, which can condense moisture and destroy detail; if water is pooling, divert runoff with a shallow trench or sandbags without disturbing the impression. Collect a cast only after the impression is documented and the soil is stable; if the soil is saturated, consider a gel lift or a careful casting with the manufacturer's cold-weather mix. Next, protect the window exterior and sill from rain with a temporary shelter, then collect any trace or DNA before it washes away. Do not walk between the sill and the impression; establish a path. Document weather conditions and the time of protection.