Postmortem Drawing After Advanced Decomposition
A medical examiner asks for a postmortem drawing of a woman found in a shallow grave after three weeks. The body is in advanced decomposition; the face is swollen, skin slippage is present, and the left orbit is collapsed. The medical examiner has estimated age 40 to 60 and no dental records are available yet. A family believes the decedent is their 52-year-old sister, but visual identification is not possible. The detective wants a clean drawing of the woman's face as she looked in life for a media release and for the family to view. The artist has a partial fingerprint, a tattoo on the right forearm described as a rose, and a photograph of the woman's sister, who is 10 years older and resembles her. The detective asks the artist to make her look like the sister so the family can confirm. What should the artist do?
1. What should the postmortem drawing depict, and how should decomposition changes be handled?
Read the worked answer
The drawing should separate documentation from reconstruction. The artist should first record the observed condition: swelling, skin slippage, the collapsed left orbit, and any visible features that survive decomposition. For a life-like drawing, the artist may reduce swelling and restore normal contours only to the extent supported by the medical examiner's findings and standard decomposition changes, and should note every adjustment. The left orbit should not be given a specific eye appearance that cannot be supported. The artist should avoid inventing a nose tip, lip shape, or ear detail that decomposition has destroyed. If the goal is media identification, a neutral drawing with the known tattoo and a clear statement of uncertainty is more defensible than a polished portrait. The artist should retain the documentation drawing and the reconstruction drawing as separate products.
2. How should the sister's photograph be used?
Read the worked answer
The sister's photograph may be used only as a general reference for family resemblance, not as a template for the decedent's face. Making the drawing look like the sister would create a circular identification: the family would be asked to confirm a face that was built from their own relative. The artist should not use the sister's hairstyle, eye shape, or specific features as if they were the decedent's. If family resemblance is relevant, the artist should document it as a weak reference and should keep the reconstruction anchored to the postmortem findings. The better path is DNA or dental comparison, with the drawing used only to generate tips. The artist should explain this to the detective and record the request and refusal.
3. What cautions should accompany the media release and family viewing?
Read the worked answer
The release should state that the drawing is a reconstruction from a decomposed body, not a photograph, and that it is not an identification. It should list the known tattoo and the estimated age range, and should ask anyone with information to contact the agency. The family should be prepared before viewing: they should be told that the image is an approximation, that swelling and decomposition have been adjusted, and that resemblance is not proof. The artist should avoid showing the drawing as a confirmed likeness of the sister. If the family reacts strongly, the agency should not treat that reaction as identification; DNA or dental records remain necessary. The artist should retain the original documentation, the reconstruction, and the rationale for every change.