Cast-Off, Void, and Transfer in a Bedroom Assault
At 02:40, a 28-year-old male is found deceased in a 3.0 m by 3.6 m bedroom. On the east wall (2.4 m high), 12 discrete bloodstains form a narrow linear arc. Three representative stains measure 4.0 mm wide by 8.0 mm long, 3.0 mm wide by 6.0 mm long, and 2.5 mm wide by 5.0 mm long. A 30 cm by 40 cm void is centered 1.1 m above the floor. Directly below the void, a bloody shoe transfer points toward the door. On the bed, a passive drop pattern with satellite spatter surrounds a 10 cm pool. A broken lamp lies on the floor 1.2 m from the wall. The suspect says he never entered the room. The scene is secured; the body has not been moved. You are the bloodstain analyst asked to interpret the wall pattern before the wall is swabbed.
1. Calculate the angle of impact for the three representative stains and classify the wall pattern. Show your work.
Read the worked answer
Use the impact-angle formula sin θ = W/L, where W is stain width and L is stain length. For 4.0/8.0 = 0.500, θ = 30°. For 3.0/6.0 = 0.500, θ = 30°. For 2.5/5.0 = 0.500, θ = 30°. The three stains therefore share an impact angle of about 30° to the wall surface. The pattern is a narrow linear arc of small stains with similar angles, which is more consistent with cast-off than with a single impact spatter; impact spatter would usually show a wider range of angles and a radial distribution around an impact site. The classification is supportive, not definitive, because a low-velocity impact against a nearby surface could produce overlapping stains. I would compare the arc direction, stain size gradient, and the void before finalizing.
2. What can the void and the shoe transfer tell you about sequence, and what can they not tell you?
Read the worked answer
The void is a 30 cm by 40 cm area where no blood landed; that means an object or person occupied that space during the staining event and blocked the wall. The shoe transfer below the void indicates contact with a bloody surface at some point. The sequence is most likely: blood was shed, the void was created by an object or person close to the wall, and later a bloody shoe contacted the floor or wall area and pointed toward the door. However, the void does not identify the blocker, and the transfer does not prove the suspect made it; the shoe must be compared and the transfer photographed with scale. The transfer could also have been made before the void if the blood source was different. I would not give a firm sequence without sampling and comparison.
3. The prosecutor asks whether the 12 stains prove at least 12 blows. How do you respond?
Read the worked answer
No. The 12 stains do not equal 12 blows. A single cast-off event can produce many stains, and one blow can produce more than one arc depending on the weapon and swing. To estimate a minimum number of blows, I would look for separate cast-off arcs with different directions or origins, not count individual stains. Even then, the minimum is limited by overlap and missing stains. The better opinion is that the pattern indicates at least one cast-off event; it does not support a specific blow count.