IBBFA Barre study materials
IBBFA Barre study resources

Client Refuses Knee Modifications and the Studio Wants Retention

IBBFA Barre · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Client Refuses Knee Modifications and the Studio Wants Retention

During a 60-minute barre class, a regular client, Sofia, 51, repeatedly drops into a deep turned-out plié despite your three general cues to reduce depth. You notice her right knee tracking inside her second toe and hear her say it is fine when a neighbor asks. After class she tells you, 'I have been doing barre for 10 years; my knee only hurts when I don't go deep enough. Don't baby me.' She has a package of 10 sessions, and the studio owner has emphasized retention and no drama. You have no written medical clearance on file, and she has not disclosed any diagnosis. The next class starts in 15 minutes, the front desk is unstaffed, and you are the only instructor on shift.

1. What do you say to Sofia in the 15 minutes before the next class? Write a short script that sets a boundary without shaming her.

Read the worked answer

I would keep it short and non-defensive: 'Sofia, I need to talk about your knee before we start. I saw it tracking inward in the deep plié, and you said it hurts when you don't go deep. I am not going to diagnose it, but I can't ignore that in a group class. For today, I want you to take the shallow track and keep the knee over the second toe. If you want to work deeper, I need a note from your physio or doctor, or we can set up a private session to look at your mechanics.' If she says she is fine, I would repeat the boundary once: 'I hear you, but I am not comfortable coaching you through pain.' I would offer her a front-row spot to make cuing easier. I would not argue about her 10 years of experience.

2. What do you document, and what do you tell the studio owner given the retention pressure?

Read the worked answer

Documentation: date and time; what I observed (right knee medial to second toe in deep turned-out plié); her reported pain and exact words; cues given; modification offered; her response; whether she stayed in class; advice to seek medical clearance. I would avoid diagnostic language and stick to observable facts. To the owner: 'Sofia is reporting knee pain and declining modification. I have documented it and asked for clearance. I need your support on the policy that we do not coach through pain, even if she is a long-term client.' I would propose a private session or a written medical clearance requirement for deep plié. Retention is a business goal, but it does not justify colluding with an injury risk.

3. In the next class she again drops deep and says she is fine. What escalation is appropriate, and what is not?

Read the worked answer

Appropriate escalation: a quiet individual reminder before the set, a universal cue, and then a direct redirection-'Sofia, take the shallow range or sit this one out.' If she continues, I would stop her participation in that component and ask her to observe, not physically move her. I would tell her that continuing without clearance means no deep plié in my class. I would document the second refusal and ask the owner to apply the studio's policy. Not appropriate: public shaming, diagnosing a meniscus or patellofemoral issue, yanking her knee into alignment, ignoring the behavior to avoid conflict, or letting her continue because she has paid for a package. If she develops locking, giving-way, or marked swelling, I would advise urgent medical assessment.