Appraising the experience-centre investment at Pennine Outdoor
Pennine Outdoor runs 18 outdoor equipment stores. Revenue is £42m, like-for-like sales are down 6%, footfall is down 14% and online sales are 6% of revenue against an estimated 22% for the market. The board is considering a £2.5m programme to convert four stores into experience centres with climbing walls, boot-fitting labs and repair workshops, plus a click-and-collect hub. Management forecasts incremental contribution of £620,000 a year and additional fixed costs of £210,000 a year for eight years, after which leases are renegotiable. The discount rate is 10%; the eight-year annuity factor at 10% is 5.335. The largest shareholder argues that we cannot afford to stand still and wants the full £2.5m approved at the next board meeting. Two of the four target stores have lease breaks in 18 months. Competitors include a discount chain expanding aggressively and brand-owned websites.
1. Appraise the proposal financially: calculate the net present value, the approximate internal rate of return, the payback period and the sensitivity of the NPV to the annual net cash flow. Interpret the results.
Read the worked answer
Annual net cash flow
£620,000 contribution − £210,000 fixed costs = £410,000
NPV
£410,000 × 5.335 = £2,187,350; less £2,500,000 = −£312,650
The project destroys about £313,000 of value at a 10% discount rate.
IRR
Required annuity factor: £2,500,000 ÷ £410,000 = 6.098. At 6% the eight-year factor is 6.210; at 7% it is 5.971. Interpolating gives an IRR of about 6.5%, below the 10% cost of capital.
Payback
£2,500,000 ÷ £410,000 = 6.1 years out of an eight-year life, so most of the return arrives late and depends on assumptions that hold well beyond the lease breaks.
Sensitivity
Break-even annual net cash flow = £2,500,000 ÷ 5.335 = £468,600, 14.3% above forecast. A 10% shortfall in contribution (£558,000 − £210,000 = £348,000) gives an NPV of £348,000 × 5.335 − £2,500,000 = −£643,000. The decision is highly geared to a contribution figure that is not yet evidenced.
The numbers do not support approval of the full £2.5m on the stated case. They do not, however, prove the idea is wrong - the forecast is unproven, not discredited.
2. Evaluate the strategic case for the programme using Porter's five forces and the value chain, and recommend how the board should proceed.
Read the worked answer
Five forces
Buyer power is high: prices are transparent online and customers can switch at negligible cost. The threat of substitutes is high and rising, with brand-owned websites selling direct. Rivalry is intense, with a discount chain expanding. Supplier power is shifting towards brands that control their own online channels. The threat of new entrants is high online but low in physical experience retail, because property, fitting expertise and service reputation are real barriers.
Value chain
The stores' defensible value is not stock holding - the discount chain and websites win there - but advice, fitting, repair and community. Those activities sit in service and sales, and they are exactly what the proposal strengthens. Against that, 18 leases and a distribution network built for stores are a cost disadvantage that the programme does not fix; it adds cost to four sites.
Recommendation
Do not approve £2.5m at this board. Approve a phased pilot: convert two stores with lease breaks at roughly £1.2m, with stage gates at 12 months - incremental contribution at least £200,000, rebooking and NPS improvement, online conversion uplift. Negotiate the lease breaks as an exit option, seek supplier co-funding, and re-run the full appraisal on pilot data.
The strategic argument has force: doing nothing in a channel shifting to 22% online is also a choice. But strategic urgency is not a reason to bypass the numbers; it is a reason to buy the information cheaply through a pilot rather than pay £2.5m to discover it.