Mixed ITC, ISD Common Services and Expired E-Way Bill
Sunrise Foods Ltd has manufacturing units in Gujarat and Maharashtra, each with a separate GSTIN. During FY 2024-25 it avails ITC of: (i) ₹42 lakh on civil construction of a cold storage warehouse used to store both raw materials and finished goods; (ii) ₹18 lakh on foundation and installation of a new packaging machine; (iii) ₹6 lakh on CSR activities under section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013; (iv) ₹14 lakh on an Innova car used by the managing director; and (v) ₹9 lakh on audit fees, security services and software used for both units. Its Gujarat unit also transports 500 cartons of biscuits of taxable value ₹1.8 lakh to a customer in Maharashtra. The e-way bill expired after a vehicle breakdown, and the transporter did not extend it. The goods were intercepted 12 hours after expiry. The applicable GST rate is 18%. The company seeks advice on ITC and detention.
1. Advise Sunrise Foods on the eligibility of ITC for each of the five items, citing the relevant provisions and reasoning.
Read the worked answer
Item-wise analysis:
Cold storage warehouse civil construction - ₹42 lakh: ITC is blocked under section 17(5)(d), which denies credit for goods or services received for construction of immovable property, including works contract services, except where it is plant and machinery. A cold storage warehouse is a building or civil structure, not plant and machinery. The fact that it is used for business does not cure the block. Credit must be reversed.
Foundation and installation of packaging machine - ₹18 lakh: A packaging machine is plant and machinery. ITC on the machine and its installation is generally allowed. The foundation needs scrutiny: if it is a concrete civil structure separate from the machine, credit may be blocked under section 17(5)(d); if it is an integral foundation necessary for the machine to function and qualifies as part of plant and machinery, credit is defensible. Maintain technical documentation and capitalise appropriately.
CSR expenditure - ₹6 lakh: Blocked under section 17(5)(fa) where used for CSR activities referred to in section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Innova car for MD - ₹14 lakh: Blocked under section 17(5)(a) unless used for transportation of goods, passenger transport, driving school or other specified purposes. A car for the managing director does not qualify; seating capacity is also below the 13-person threshold.
Audit fees, security and software - ₹9 lakh: These are common input services used in both Gujarat and Maharashtra. If received by one GSTIN, that GSTIN cannot claim the full credit for another state's use. Section 20 read with rule 39 requires distribution through an Input Service Distributor. Without ISD registration, only the portion attributable to the receiving state can be taken; the balance must be cross-charged or distributed after ISD registration. Common credit also requires rule 42 reversal for exempt supplies, if any.
2. How should the ₹9 lakh common input services be treated if Sunrise has not registered as an ISD? Is there a corrective mechanism?
Read the worked answer
Default position: Section 20 requires an ISD to distribute credit of input services used in more than one state or union territory. Rule 39 prescribes the distribution formula. If Sunrise has not registered as an ISD, the Gujarat GSTIN should not avail the entire ₹9 lakh merely because the invoices are addressed to it. It can avail only the portion relating to Gujarat; the Maharashtra portion cannot be availed by the Maharashtra GSTIN without a valid distribution document.
Corrective mechanism: Sunrise should obtain ISD registration, preferably from the date from which the common services were first received, and distribute the credit through FORM GST ITC-02 or the prescribed ISD invoices and returns. If past periods are involved, it should reverse the excess credit availed in Gujarat, pay interest under section 50, and then distribute the eligible credit through the ISD. Voluntary reversal before audit reduces penalty exposure.
Alternative: The service provider can raise separate invoices on each GSTIN for the respective portion, supported by a cost-allocation key. This is simpler but must reflect actual use. A mere cross-charge without an ISD may still be questioned. The company should document the allocation basis, such as headcount or turnover, and keep it consistent.
3. Analyse the e-way bill violation and quantify the penalty. What defences and release options are available?
Read the worked answer
E-way bill requirement: Rule 138 requires an e-way bill for movement of goods of consignment value exceeding ₹50,000. The consignment is ₹1.8 lakh, so an e-way bill was mandatory. The bill was valid when movement began but expired after the breakdown, and the transporter did not extend it within the prescribed window. An expired e-way bill is not a valid document for the intercepted movement.
Penalty: Under section 129(1)(a), goods and conveyance are liable to detention or seizure and release on payment of penalty equal to 200% of the tax payable on the goods. Tax at 18% on ₹1.8 lakh is ₹32,400; penalty is ₹64,800. The owner can seek release on payment of the penalty and applicable charges. If the goods are exempt, the lower of 2% of value or ₹25,000 applies, but that is not the case here.
Defences: The company can argue that the e-way bill was genuine and valid at dispatch, the breakdown was documented, there was no intent to evade tax, and the goods and invoices are genuine. Courts have quashed detention for technical or minor breaches where there is no evasion. However, the statutory scheme is strict, and the department may not accept the defence at the detention stage.
Practical step: Pay the penalty under protest, obtain release, and file an appeal or refund claim. Preserve the breakdown report, repair bill, transporter correspondence and e-way bill history. Also update the e-way bill immediately in future breakdown cases.