The Returning Gulf Professional: Fixing Residential Status Before Filing
Mr. Arvind Nair, an Indian citizen, worked in Dubai from April 2019 to August 2024 and returned to Pune on 1 September 2024 to join an Indian employer. During the last ten years his only stay in India was 20 December 2023 to 15 January 2024 (27 days); he was non-resident in every earlier year. For FY 2024-25 his receipts were: ₹6,00,000 salary from the Dubai employer for July–August 2024, for services rendered in Dubai and credited to his Dubai bank account; ₹2,40,000 dividend from listed Indian companies, credited to the same Dubai account; ₹1,50,000 interest on a fixed deposit with a UAE bank; ₹7,00,000 Indian salary from September 2024 onwards; and ₹40,000 interest from Indian bank fixed deposits. He has no treaty relief to claim and no foreign assets other than the Dubai deposit. Before filing, his cousin advises him that had he returned on 1 November 2024 instead, he would have paid no Indian tax at all. Arvind asks you to fix his status, his taxable income, and to test that advice.
1. Determine Mr. Nair's residential status for AY 2025-26, showing each test applied, and state why section 6(1A) does or does not change the answer.
Read the worked answer
Step 1 – Basic condition, section 6(1)(a): Stay in India in FY 2024-25 = 1 September 2024 to 31 March 2025 = 30+31+30+31+31+28+31 = 212 days, which is ≥ 182 days. He is therefore a resident under section 6(1)(a).
Step 2 – Does the 60-day rule matter? No. The relaxation reducing 182 days to 60 days + 365 days applies to an Indian citizen leaving India for employment abroad or as crew. Mr. Nair is returning, so the ordinary 182-day condition governs. Since 212 > 182, the point is academic.
Step 3 – Resident but not ordinarily resident, section 6(6): A resident is RNOR if (a) he was non-resident in at least 9 of the 10 preceding previous years, or (b) his stay in India during the 7 preceding previous years is ≤ 729 days. Condition (a) is satisfied – he was non-resident in FY 2014-15 to FY 2023-24. Status: Resident but Not Ordinarily Resident.
Step 4 – Section 6(1A): This deems an Indian citizen with Indian income exceeding ₹15 lakh and not liable to tax in any other country to be resident, but only where he is not resident under section 6(1). Here he is already resident under 6(1)(a), so 6(1A) is irrelevant; in any case his Indian income (about ₹9.8 lakh) is below ₹15 lakh, and the deeming provision would only have made him RNOR.
2. Compute his total income for AY 2025-26 under the default regime and explain the treatment of each receipt.
Read the worked answer
| Receipt | Amount (₹) | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Dubai salary, July–August 2024 | 6,00,000 | Services rendered and salary received outside India from a foreign source → not taxable for an RNOR (section 5(1) proviso) |
| Dividend from Indian companies | 2,40,000 | Indian income – accrues in India, taxable even if received in a Dubai account |
| UAE fixed deposit interest | 1,50,000 | Foreign source income received abroad → not taxable |
| Indian salary (Sep 2024 – Mar 2025) | 7,00,000 | Taxable under Salaries; standard deduction ₹75,000 under the default regime |
| Indian FD interest | 40,000 | Taxable as Income from Other Sources |
Computation: Salary 7,00,000 – 75,000 = 6,25,000; Other sources 2,40,000 + 40,000 = 2,80,000. Total income = ₹9,05,000.
Tax (section 115BAC slabs): 3,00,000–7,00,000 @5% = 20,000; 7,00,000–9,05,000 @10% = 20,500 → ₹40,500 + 4% cess ₹1,620 = ₹42,120. Rebate under section 87A is not available because total income exceeds ₹7,00,000, and marginal relief does not help (excess over ₹7 lakh, ₹2,05,000, far exceeds the tax). For completeness, the old regime would give total income of ₹9,30,000 and tax of ₹98,500 plus cess, so the default regime is clearly better here.
3. Evaluate the cousin's advice that returning on 1 November 2024 would have eliminated Indian tax. Support your answer with the day count.
Read the worked answer
Day count on the alternative date: 1 November 2024 to 31 March 2025 = 30+31+31+28+31+31 = 151 days < 182.
Effect: He would fail section 6(1)(a). The 60-day + 365-day condition is not available to a citizen returning to India; even if it were, his stay in the preceding four previous years (27 days) is below 365 days, so he would still fail. He would therefore be non-resident for FY 2024-25.
But the tax result hardly changes:
- Salary for services rendered in India is Indian income and is taxable whether he is RNOR or non-resident.
- Dividend from Indian companies is Indian income in both cases.
- Indian bank interest is Indian income in both cases.
- The foreign salary and UAE interest are exempt for an RNOR and equally exempt for a non-resident. That is the only category where status mattered, and both statuses give the same relief.
Conclusion: The advice is wrong. The saving he imagines does not exist; the only real difference is procedural (he would still have to file a return if his Indian income exceeds the basic exemption). Advise him instead to preserve the RNOR position for FY 2025-26 by keeping his stay in that year below 182 days and below 365 days across the four preceding years, and by ensuring his India stay in the seven preceding years stays within 729 days, if he wants foreign income to remain outside the net for one more year.