Five Months In, and a Request for Secrecy
You are a peer recovery specialist at a community recovery center. "T" is a 34-year-old woman you have worked with for five months. Six years ago the two of you were arrested together and used together; you have known her brother since high school. T has a 9-year-old daughter and an open child protective services case with a safety plan requiring random drug screens and attendance at all appointments. On Tuesday, T tells you she used fentanyl twice over the weekend and has skipped her outpatient group three weeks running. She begs you not to tell anyone: "You're the only one who gets it." On Thursday your supervisor says CPS has requested records. That afternoon T asks you to be her NA sponsor and hands you a $50 gift card "for saving my life."
1. What can you keep confidential, what can you not, and what do you tell T now?
Read the worked answer
Start by correcting any impression you may have given. Peer support is not the same as licensed clinical confidentiality; what you can promise depends on your agency's policy and your state's rules, and T deserves the accurate version now rather than discovering it later. If you ever implied you were a vault, say so and fix it.
On substance: her disclosure of use is largely hers to control, but you cannot promise secrecy where a child safety plan is at stake, where the agency receives a records request, or where your state's mandated reporter law reaches you - and mandated reporter status varies by state and by role, so know yours before this conversation rather than guessing after it. The CPS request runs through your supervisor and the agency's records process; you do not hand over records or narrate her disclosure on your own initiative.
What T needs is honesty plus a plan: what you will do, what you won't, what happens next, and where she is in it. Keeping the relationship by promising something you can't deliver is the one outcome that guarantees losing it.
2. T asks you to be her NA sponsor. What do you say, and what do you do with the request?
Read the worked answer
Decline, and be specific so it lands as a boundary rather than a rejection. Being her sponsor and her peer specialist puts two different accountabilities in one relationship: a sponsor holds honesty and step work with no agency oversight, while a specialist is documented, supervised, and bound by policy. She could not tell which role was answering, and neither could you when the two conflicted.
Add the history plainly: you used together, you know her brother, and you share a small recovery community. That is already a great deal of overlap for a role that works best when it is clean of prior entanglement.
Then don't leave a void. Help her identify potential sponsors at meetings she actually attends, talk through what she wants from a sponsor, and offer to be a bridge to a first conversation. Bring the whole situation to supervision and write a boundary plan, including how you will handle the shared history if she raises it in a group setting or in front of other participants.
3. T hands you a $50 gift card. What do you do, and what do you document?
Read the worked answer
Decline it, warmly and immediately, and know your agency's gift policy before you open your mouth so the answer isn't improvised. Whatever the policy says, the context decides this one: a $50 card from a person with an open CPS case, handed over in the same conversation as a request to keep a secret, is not a thank-you. It is the start of an obligation, and accepting it signals that honesty is negotiable between you.
Say something usable: "I'm glad this has been useful to you, and I can't take this - it isn't what the work is for." If you want to honor the impulse, invite her to say it out loud or to write it down, and tell her where a donation could go if the center accepts them.
Document the offer and the refusal the same day, and tell your supervisor, because if it surfaces again - or if she describes it differently to someone else - you want a record that predates the question. Also raise the long-standing dual-relationship history in supervision as a standing risk, not a one-time event.