Choosing Between a Partnership, an LLP and a Private Company for a Four-Promoter Analytics Venture
Four professionals - two engineers and two finance specialists - plan to launch a B2B analytics venture in Pune. They will contribute ₹50 lakh in cash, and one founder will contribute a proprietary software licence valued at ₹40 lakh; the licence is currently registered in that founder's name, not in a firm or company. They expect annual turnover of ₹6 crore by year three and want to raise angel funding within 18 months. One founder may exit after two years and wants a clean transfer mechanism. They are worried about personal liability if a client sues for data loss, about compliance burden, and about double taxation of profits. A bank has indicated it will lend only to a body corporate with audited accounts. The founders have not decided between a partnership firm, an LLP and a private limited company.
1. Recommend the most appropriate business form for the four founders. Compare liability, funding, transferability, taxation and compliance, and explain why the other two forms are less suitable.
Read the worked answer
Recommendation: private limited company. The decision turns on four constraints in the facts.
- Funding: angel investors usually subscribe to equity or compulsorily convertible preference shares. Only a company can issue shares. An LLP admits investors as partners, which requires amending the LLP agreement and often the consent of all partners; a partnership firm has the same problem plus unlimited liability.
- Liability: a private company is a separate legal entity, so the founders' personal assets are generally protected against a client claim for data loss. In a partnership firm, partners are jointly and severally liable without limit. An LLP gives limited liability, but the funding and exit constraints remain.
- Transferability: shares can be transferred subject to the articles and any shareholders' agreement. In an LLP, a partner's interest is not freely transferable; the exiting founder would need consent and a valuation mechanism.
- Taxation: a company pays corporate tax and shareholders pay tax on dividends; an LLP is taxed at the firm level and profit shares in partners' hands are generally exempt. Tax alone does not justify choosing an LLP because the funding and liability profile dominate.
- Compliance: a company has more filings - board meetings, annual returns, audit, MCA forms - but the bank's lending condition and the expected angel round make those costs unavoidable.
A partnership is unsuitable because of unlimited liability and inability to issue shares. An LLP is a credible fallback only if the founders abandon equity funding and accept a partner-transfer regime.
2. If the founders choose an LLP instead, explain the consequences for the proposed angel investment and for the exiting founder, and outline the conversion route to a private company later.
Read the worked answer
An LLP cannot issue equity shares. An angel investor would have to become a partner by contributing capital and signing or amending the LLP agreement. That changes the governance bargain: major decisions may require partner consent, and the investor may demand exit rights, reserved matters and a profit-share formula. The investment is also harder to structure as a priced round because there is no share capital, no premium and no cap table in the company-law sense.
For the exiting founder, the LLP agreement must contain a transfer or retirement mechanism. Without it, the partner cannot simply sell his interest; the other partners' consent and a valuation will be needed. Admission of a new partner and transfer of a partner's interest are governed by the LLP agreement and, in default, by the LLP Act.
Conversion to a private company is possible under the LLP Act and the Companies Act. In practice the founders should: (i) obtain all partners' approval and any investor consent; (ii) settle assets and liabilities and obtain a valuation; (iii) comply with the conversion scheme and file the prescribed LLP and company forms; (iv) allot shares in the new company to the partners in the agreed ratio; and (v) transfer licences, contracts and bank accounts. Conversion is not a cure for a badly drafted LLP agreement, so the exit and funding terms should be fixed before conversion.
3. Assuming they incorporate a private company, identify two filings that must be made soon after incorporation and state the consequence of missing the commencement-of-business filing.
Read the worked answer
Two immediate filings are:
- INC-20A declaration for commencement of business under Section 10A of the Companies Act, 2013, within 180 days of incorporation. A director and a professional must declare that the subscribers have paid the subscription amount. Until this is filed, the company cannot commence business or exercise borrowing powers.
- Appointment of the first auditor by the board within 30 days of incorporation, followed by ADT-1. If the board fails, the members must appoint the auditor at an extraordinary general meeting within 90 days.
Missing INC-20A has serious operational consequences: the company cannot lawfully start trading or borrow. The company is liable to a penalty and every officer in default is liable to a continuing penalty. The bank lending condition cannot be satisfied until the company can exercise borrowing powers. The founders should also hold the first board meeting within 30 days, file the registered-office verification if not done at incorporation, and obtain the tax registrations.