Residential Status and Scope of Total Income for an Employee Leaving India Mid-Year
Mr. Arjun Mehta, an Indian citizen aged 42, has been resident in India in 9 out of the 10 previous years preceding PY 2024-25 and stayed 850 days in the 7 preceding previous years. On 1 August 2024 he leaves India to take up employment with a company in Dubai. He returns on 15 March 2025 for a family visit and stays until 31 March 2025. His stay in India during 2024-25 is 122 days (1 April to 31 July) plus 17 days (15 to 31 March), totalling 139 days. During the year he receives: salary from the Dubai employer for August-March, Rs 18,00,000, credited to a Dubai bank account; rent from a house property in Pune, Rs 3,60,000, received in India; interest on an Indian fixed deposit, Rs 45,000; and dividend from an Indian company, Rs 20,000. He has no other income and paid no municipal taxes. The Assessing Officer contends that Mr. Mehta is resident because he stayed 139 days and has 850 days in the preceding 7 years, and seeks to tax the Dubai salary. Mr. Mehta claims non-resident status.
1. Determine Mr. Mehta's residential status for AY 2025-26. Does the Assessing Officer's reasoning hold?
Read the worked answer
Apply section 6(1). Clause (a) requires 182 days in India; Mr. Mehta stayed only 139 days. Clause (c) normally requires 60 days plus 365 days in the preceding four years, but for an Indian citizen leaving India for employment outside India, the 60-day figure is substituted by 182 days. He fails that 182-day test. Clause (b), the 120-day rule for high-income Indian citizens, does not apply because his Indian income is only Rs 4,25,000, far below Rs 15 lakh. The 850 days in 7 years is not an independent test; it is relevant only to the ordinarily-resident/RNOR analysis after basic residency is established. Since basic residency itself fails, he is a non-resident. The Assessing Officer's reasoning is therefore incorrect.
2. Compute total income and tax liability under the default tax regime, explaining the treatment of each item.
Read the worked answer
As a non-resident, Mr. Mehta is taxable only on income received or accruing in India. The Dubai salary for services rendered outside India and credited abroad is not taxable in India. The Pune rent is taxable as income from house property: gross annual value Rs 3,60,000 minus 30% standard deduction Rs 1,08,000 = Rs 2,52,000. Fixed deposit interest Rs 45,000 and dividend Rs 20,000 are taxable under other sources, totalling Rs 65,000. Total income = Rs 3,17,000. Under the default new regime, the basic exemption is Rs 3,00,000, so tax on Rs 17,000 at 5% is Rs 850. Rebate under section 87A is available because total income is below Rs 7,00,000, extinguishing the tax. Health and education cess is nil. If he validly opts for the old regime, tax would be about Rs 3,350 plus cess, so the default regime is beneficial.
3. What are the TDS, advance tax and return-filing implications?
Read the worked answer
The final tax liability is nil, so no advance tax is payable; advance tax applies only where liability is Rs 10,000 or more. TDS may still have been deducted at source: the bank may deduct 10% on fixed deposit interest exceeding Rs 40,000, and the company may deduct 10% on dividend exceeding Rs 5,000. Rent of Rs 3,60,000 may also attract TDS if the payer is required to deduct under section 194-I. Mr. Mehta should file a return to claim refund of the TDS, even though filing is not mandatory where income is below the exemption limit. He must disclose his non-resident status and Indian-source income only.