PEP Relationship and Source of Wealth
A private banking client, Ms. B, is a foreign government official (Minister of Energy) from a country with a high corruption perception index. She has been a customer for two years, and her account primarily receives monthly transfers of $50,000 from a state-owned oil company, described as 'consultancy fees'. She also receives occasional large gifts from unknown third parties. The bank initially classified her as a PEP but did not conduct enhanced due diligence (EDD) beyond standard CDD. Recently, she requested to open an account for her adult son, who is a student with no independent income, and to transfer $2 million from her account to his. The bank's policy requires EDD for PEPs, including source of wealth and source of funds verification. The relationship manager is pushing to expedite the son's account opening.
1. Identify the key AML/CTF risks in this relationship and explain why EDD is necessary.
Read the worked answer
Key risks:
- PEP status: Ms. B is a foreign PEP, which automatically qualifies as high risk under FATF Recommendations. Her position as Minister of Energy in a corrupt country increases the risk of bribery and corruption.
- Source of funds/wealth concerns: Monthly payments from a state-owned oil company labeled 'consultancy fees' may be a cover for kickbacks or embezzlement. The lack of EDD means the bank has not verified the legitimacy of these funds.
- Unexplained gifts: Large gifts from unknown third parties are a red flag for potential bribery or laundering.
- Third-party account opening: The son is a student with no independent income; transferring $2 million to him could be an attempt to obscure the origin of funds or to place assets beyond scrutiny.
- Inadequate due diligence: The bank failed to apply EDD as required by its policy and FATF standards, creating regulatory and reputational risk. EDD is necessary to understand the source of wealth and funds, to assess the risk of corruption, and to mitigate the risk of the bank facilitating money laundering or terrorist financing.
2. What EDD measures should the bank have taken initially, and what should it do now before considering the son's account and the $2 million transfer?
Read the worked answer
Initially, the bank should have:
- Obtained senior management approval for the PEP relationship.
- Established source of wealth and source of funds through reliable, independent documentation (e.g., tax returns, employment contracts, company financials).
- Conducted enhanced ongoing monitoring of the account.
- Verified the legitimacy of the 'consultancy fees' from the state-owned company. Now, before proceeding:
- Conduct retrospective EDD on Ms. B, including a detailed review of all transactions, source of wealth, and the origin of the gifts.
- Do not open the son's account until EDD is complete and the source of the $2 million is verified. The son is also a PEP by association (family member), so EDD applies to him as well.
- Escalate to senior management for approval, given the high-risk nature.
- Consider filing a SAR if the source of funds cannot be satisfactorily explained.
- Document all findings and decisions. The relationship manager's push to expedite should be resisted; compliance takes precedence.