Who Won the Cuban Missile Crisis? Testing a Draft Claim Against Four Sources
For a project on the Cold War, a student examines the Cuban Missile Crisis. She has: (A) extracts from the ExComm meetings, October 1962, released in the 1990s, in which Kennedy and advisers discuss air strikes and blockade; (B) a Soviet general's memoir published in 1990, claiming Soviet forces in Cuba had tactical nuclear weapons and could have used them without Moscow's permission if invaded; (C) a British newspaper editorial from 28 October 1962 praising Kennedy's 'firmness' and saying 'Khrushchev blinked'; (D) a Cuban school textbook from 1985 describing the crisis as a victory over American imperialism. The student wants to write: 'The crisis was resolved because Kennedy stood firm and the Soviets backed down.' Her teacher asks her to test that claim against the sources and to consider what a historian in 2062 might ask.
1. Assess the usefulness and limitations of sources A and B for explaining how the crisis was resolved.
Read the worked answer
Source A is a primary record of the US decision-making process, but it is not a complete or neutral transcript. The ExComm recordings were released decades later, and they show debate, uncertainty, and options that were rejected. They are excellent for asking how Kennedy's advisers weighed air strikes against a blockade, but they cannot by themselves prove why the Soviets withdrew. Source B is a memoir published in 1990, 28 years after the crisis. Memoirs are shaped by memory, hindsight, and self-justification; the general may want to emphasise Soviet seriousness or his own role. His claim that Soviet forces had tactical nuclear weapons and might have used them without Moscow's permission is important but must be checked against archives and other testimony. It is useful for the Soviet and Cuban dimension, which Source A largely lacks. The student should use A for US deliberations and B for the risk and the Soviet perspective, while treating both as partial.
2. Source C says 'Khrushchev blinked.' Source D calls it a Cuban victory. How should the student handle these conflicting interpretations?
Read the worked answer
The student should handle C and D as interpretations with purposes, not as neutral facts. Source C is a British newspaper editorial written on 28 October 1962, at the height of the crisis. It speaks to a Western audience, uses the language of 'firmness' and 'blinking', and probably reflects relief as well as analysis. It omits Soviet security concerns, the US missiles in Turkey, and the secret diplomacy. Source D is a Cuban school textbook from 1985. It is designed to teach a national and ideological narrative of resistance to American imperialism; it may emphasise Cuban resolve and omit Cuban dependence on Soviet decisions or the costs of the crisis. Both are useful evidence of how the crisis was understood and taught. The student should compare them with A and B, ask what each leaves out, and avoid simply choosing the account that matches her own draft.
3. The student's draft claim is 'resolved because Kennedy stood firm and the Soviets backed down.' Rewrite the claim so it is defensible and explain what further evidence would be needed.
Read the worked answer
A defensible rewrite would be: 'The crisis was publicly resolved after a US naval blockade and intense diplomacy. Kennedy's refusal to invade was one factor, but Soviet withdrawal was also secured by a secret agreement: the US promised not to invade Cuba and later removed missiles from Turkey. Soviet calculations, fear of escalation, and back-channel communication mattered.' This avoids the single-cause claim that 'firmness' alone produced the outcome. To support it, the student would need fuller ExComm transcripts, Soviet Politburo records, Cuban archives, records of the Turkey missile withdrawal, and contemporary diplomatic cables. She should also note that the crisis was resolved without war but at a high risk, and that the public story of 'who blinked' differed from the secret bargain. A historian in 2062 might ask whose archives were opened, whose voices were recorded, and how the meaning of 'resolution' changed.