JC Religious Education study materials
JC Religious Education study resources

JC Religious Education: Religions, Ecumenism and Dialogue

JC Religious Education · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Religions, Ecumenism and Dialogue

Religions, Ecumenism and Dialogue

This domain tests the Catholic theology of other religions, ecumenism among Christians, and interreligious dialogue. It requires the distinctions between elements of truth, degrees of communion and indifferentism.

Core rules

  • Nostra Aetate (1965) rejects nothing true and holy in other religions, which often reflect a ray of truth. It also proclaims Christ as the one mediator (1 Tim 2:5). This is neither relativism nor contempt.
  • Lumen Gentium 8 teaches that the Church of Christ subsists in the Catholic Church; other churches and ecclesial communities possess real elements of sanctification and truth.
  • Ecumenism seeks the restoration of unity among Christians. Unitatis Redintegratio (1964) distinguishes spiritual ecumenism, theological dialogue and practical cooperation. Valid baptism creates real but imperfect communion.
  • Interreligious dialogue differs from ecumenism. Its forms include dialogue of life, action, theological exchange and spiritual experience.
  • The Jewish covenant is not revoked (CCC 121); supersessionism is rejected. Islam adores the one God of Abraham; Hinduism and Buddhism contain seeds of the Word and elements of grace.

Worked example

A student says Vatican II taught that all religions are equally true paths to God. Reasoning: Nostra Aetate 2 affirms truth and holiness in other religions but does not equate them with the Church or with Christ. The Church distinguishes elements of truth from the fullness of the means of salvation entrusted to her. Dominus Iesus (2000) explicitly rejects relativistic equality. Verdict: the statement confuses respect with indifferentism.

Traps

Indifferentism and relativism; quoting extra ecclesiam nulla salus without the Church's nuancing (CCC 846-848); confusing ecumenism with interreligious dialogue; dismissing valid baptism; supersessionism; presenting Rahner's anonymous Christian as official doctrine.