The Friday Deadline for 18 Rating Scales
It is Wednesday, May 28, in a publicly funded pre-K classroom. At 9 a.m. your education manager emails all teachers: complete a 30-item, English-only school-readiness rating scale for every child in your class by Friday, when the data are submitted for a state report. You have 18 children. You became the assistant teacher in February. The lead teacher resigned in January, and between January and your arrival the room had 11 different substitutes; you have no records from that period. You know 6 children well, 5 somewhat, and 7 barely. One of the 7, Aisha, started in April and speaks mostly Arabic at home. The scale asks raters to judge items such as 'uses complete sentences' and 'recognizes 12 uppercase letters.' The manager's email ends: 'Just use your best judgement - everyone's in the same boat. The numbers have to go in.'
1. How do you respond to your manager, and what will and won't you complete?
Read the worked answer
Respond in writing, promptly and without drama. State what you can defend and what you can't, and propose an alternative that still gets the report filed.
What you can defend: ratings for the 6 children you have observed since February, based on your anecdotal records, work samples, and family input, completed on a day when you are not supervising children.
What you can't: ratings for children you have known a few weeks, in a room with no records from January, using a tool you did not administer under standard conditions. A rating completed to hit a deadline is not a measurement - it is a guess entered into a state report that may be used for funding, program decisions, and, worst case, judgments about individual children. Signing it would misrepresent both the children and the program.
What you propose instead: submit the defensible subset with a written limitation note explaining the staffing disruption and the instrument's requirements; ask whether the state allows a partial or delayed submission; offer to build the missing evidence going forward with a structured observation schedule. Copy your director. If the manager insists you rate every child, ask for that instruction in writing and keep it. Do not simply refuse and go silent - the report is a real obligation, and the professional move is to solve the problem, not just decline it.
2. How do you handle Aisha and the other children you barely know?
Read the worked answer
Aisha. The instrument is English-only and asks whether she 'uses complete sentences' - but her home language is Arabic, and a child acquiring English is not a child with weak language. Rating her on English output measures her exposure to English, not her development. Options, in order of quality:
- Administer an equivalent measure in Arabic with a bilingual staff member or a qualified interpreter, and record the language of administration.
- If no equivalent exists, gather evidence through observation and family report - does she tell stories, ask questions, negotiate with peers, use complex sentences in Arabic? Ask her mother directly.
- If you must return a score, attach a written caveat explaining that the tool was administered in a language other than the child's dominant language and cannot be interpreted as a measure of her ability.
Never mark a dual language learner as delayed because the tool only speaks English - that error can follow a child for years.
The other children you barely know. Do not invent ratings. Spend the remaining days doing focused, documented observations of the most critical items, gather family input, and be explicit about which items rest on limited evidence. In your written note, distinguish clearly between 'observed,' 'reported by family,' and 'not observed.' Honest blanks and caveats are professionally acceptable; confident fiction is not.
3. What confidentiality and documentation obligations apply to this task and to the conversation with your manager?
Read the worked answer
Confidentiality. Individual rating data are education records. Do not complete scales in the staff room, leave them on a shared printer, email them from a personal account, or discuss a child's scores with another parent or with staff who do not work with that child. Store completed forms in a locked cabinet or a secure, access-controlled file, and know who in the agency is authorized to receive them.
Documentation. Keep your own dated record of the exchange: the manager's request, your response, the alternative you proposed, and the final instruction. Save it outside your personal devices. If you later need to explain why a child's rating looks thin, that record is what protects the child and you.
Families. Parents have a right to know what is being assessed, why, and how results are used. If your program does not already do so, send a short plain-language note home explaining the spring assessment and offering to go over their child's information. Aisha's mother in particular should be told, in a language she can use, how the tool handles children who speak another language at home.
Ethics. The NAEYC code is clear that assessments must be appropriate for the child and used only for the purpose they were designed for. A deadline does not convert an invalid rating into a valid one, and your signature says the rating is yours.