ARF Versus Annuity at 65 with a Health Question
Mary, aged 65, is retiring from a defined contribution scheme with a fund of €420,000. She is in good health, has a State pension entitlement of €14,000 per year, and owns her home outright. She has no dependants. She wants income of about €18,000 per year gross from the fund, indexed to inflation, and is worried about outliving her money. Her broker has recommended an Approved Retirement Fund (ARF) because 'you keep control of the money and it passes to your estate'. Mary is also attracted to the idea of an ARF because she has heard annuities are poor value. She has asked whether she can take 25% tax-free and put the rest in an ARF, and what the minimum distribution requirements are.
1. Compare the ARF and annuity options for Mary, addressing the income need, inflation, longevity risk and the tax-free lump sum.
Read the worked answer
Tax-free lump sum: Yes, Mary can take up to 25% of €420,000 = €105,000 tax-free, leaving €315,000 to invest.
Annuity route: A level or escalating annuity on €315,000 would provide a guaranteed income for life. At her age and in good health, an escalating annuity might produce roughly €12,000–€14,000 per year initially, rising with inflation. This meets the longevity concern but may not reach €18,000 and offers no estate value (unless a guarantee or dependant's pension is added, which reduces income).
ARF route: The ARF gives flexibility and estate value, and can be drawn at her chosen rate subject to the minimum distribution (4% of the ARF value per year from age 61, rising to 5% from 71, 6% from 76). But it transfers investment and longevity risk to Mary. To produce €18,000 from €315,000 is a withdrawal rate of about 5.7%, which is high for a 65-year-old and creates real risk of depletion.
Judgement: Mary's stated priority is not outliving her money, which points toward at least partial annuitisation. A blended approach - annuitise enough to cover essential spending alongside the State pension, and place the remainder in an ARF for flexibility and estate planning - is likely the better fit than an all-ARF recommendation. The broker's 'keep control' framing ignores the longevity risk Mary explicitly raised.
2. What suitability and advice-process issues arise from the broker's recommendation, and what should be documented?
Read the worked answer
The recommendation must be suitable for Mary and documented under the advice process.
Fact-find and objectives. The broker must record Mary's income need (€18,000), inflation concern, longevity concern, health, dependants (none) and attitude to risk. The ARF recommendation appears to conflict with her stated longevity concern.
Reason why letter. The broker must set out why the ARF is recommended over an annuity, addressing the longevity risk and how the 5.7% withdrawal rate is sustainable.
Product disclosure. Mary must receive the relevant information on the ARF, including the minimum distribution requirement, investment risk, and that the ARF is not guaranteed.
Conflicts and competence. The broker should disclose any commission or trail on the ARF versus the annuity, and confirm the recommendation is not driven by remuneration.
Best practice: recommend a written cash-flow projection showing the ARF under poor investment returns, and consider a split. If the broker proceeds with 100% ARF against the recorded longevity concern, that is a suitability weakness that would be difficult to defend on complaint.