I85PREP
⌘ K
Israel Bar Exam study materials
Israel Bar Exam study resources

Israel Bar Exam practice questions

One question at a time. Build your Israel Bar Exam understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Civil Procedure and Evidence

Under Israeli civil procedure, which court generally serves as the court of first instance for a civil claim whose amount in dispute is 2,000,000 NIS?

  1. The Small Claims Court
  2. The District Court Correct answer.
  3. The Family Court
  4. The Magistrate's Court

Explanation

Civil jurisdiction is allocated by the amount in dispute. Claims above the statutory threshold for Magistrate's Courts fall to the District Court as court of first instance. Small Claims and Family Courts have separate, narrower subject-matter limits.

Question 2Civil Procedure and Evidence

A plaintiff files a statement of claim. What is the defendant's principal responsive pleading under Israeli civil procedure?

  1. A counterclaim
  2. A motion to dismiss
  3. A statement of defense Correct answer.
  4. A notice of appeal

Explanation

The defendant responds to the statement of claim by filing a statement of defense within the prescribed period. A counterclaim is a separate claim against the plaintiff, not the responsive pleading itself. A motion to dismiss and a notice of appeal serve different procedural functions.

Question 3Civil Procedure and Evidence

In an Israeli civil trial, which party bears the burden of proving the facts underlying the claim?

  1. The party who denies the facts
  2. The party who asserts the facts Correct answer.
  3. The court, through its own investigation
  4. The party with greater financial resources

Explanation

The general rule is that the party asserting a fact must prove it. The burden of persuasion rests on the claimant as to the elements of the claim, and on the party raising an affirmative defense as to that defense. The court does not ordinarily investigate facts on its own motion.

Question 4Civil Procedure and Evidence

Which standard of proof applies in ordinary civil litigation in Israel?

  1. Beyond reasonable doubt
  2. Clear and convincing evidence
  3. Preponderance of the evidence Correct answer.
  4. Prima facie appearance only

Explanation

Civil cases are decided on the balance of probabilities, meaning the party bearing the burden must show its version is more likely than not. Beyond reasonable doubt is the criminal standard. Clear and convincing is a heightened standard used only in specific contexts.

Question 5Civil Procedure and Evidence

What is the general rule regarding admissibility of hearsay evidence in Israeli civil proceedings?

  1. Hearsay is admissible only in criminal cases
  2. Hearsay is admissible, subject to the court's assessment of weight and reliability Correct answer.
  3. Hearsay is categorically inadmissible
  4. Hearsay is admissible only if both parties consent

Explanation

Israeli evidence law does not impose a categorical hearsay exclusion in civil matters; out-of-court statements may be received, and the court weighs their reliability. The absence of a rigid exclusion rule reflects the free-evaluation approach to evidence.

Question 6Civil Procedure and Evidence

A party wishes to rely on a document that is in the opposing party's possession. What is the appropriate procedural step?

  1. File a motion for discovery or disclosure of documents Correct answer.
  2. Subpoena the court clerk
  3. File an appeal against the opposing party
  4. Request that the judge personally retrieve the document

Explanation

Israeli civil procedure provides mechanisms for disclosure and inspection of documents held by the opposing party. A party seeking such material applies to the court for an appropriate order. The court does not act as an investigator retrieving evidence for a party.

Question 7Civil Procedure and Evidence

Which of the following best describes the role of a pre-trial hearing in Israeli civil procedure?

  1. It is held only when the claim exceeds a statutory amount
  2. It replaces the trial and issues a final judgment
  3. It automatically transfers the case to arbitration
  4. It narrows issues, promotes settlement, and manages procedure before trial Correct answer.

Explanation

Pre-trial hearings serve case-management purposes: clarifying the disputed issues, encouraging settlement, and setting the procedural timetable. They do not substitute for the trial itself. They are not conditioned on a monetary threshold or automatic arbitration referral.

Question 8Civil Procedure and Evidence

In Israeli civil procedure, a party who fails to comply with a court order to disclose documents may face which consequence?

  1. Costs or other sanctions imposed by the court Correct answer.
  2. Automatic criminal conviction
  3. Immediate disbarment of counsel
  4. Referral to the Supreme Court as of right

Explanation

Courts have discretion to impose procedural sanctions, including costs orders, for non-compliance with disclosure obligations. Sanctions are calibrated to the breach and are not automatic criminal outcomes. Disbarment and automatic Supreme Court referral are not the ordinary consequences.

Question 9Civil Procedure and Evidence

Which statement accurately reflects the treatment of opinion testimony by an expert witness in Israeli civil proceedings?

  1. Experts are exempt from cross-examination
  2. Expert opinions are binding on the court
  3. A party may present an expert, and the court assesses the weight of the opinion Correct answer.
  4. Experts may testify only if appointed by the court

Explanation

Parties may submit expert opinions, and the court evaluates their probative value in light of the expert's qualifications and reasoning. The court is not bound by the opinion. Experts, like other witnesses, are subject to examination.

Question 10Civil Procedure and Evidence

A witness in a civil case refuses to answer a question, asserting a privilege. Which of the following is a recognized privilege under Israeli evidence law?

  1. The privilege against self-incrimination Correct answer.
  2. The privilege of prior media coverage
  3. The privilege of financial hardship
  4. The privilege of seniority in the profession

Explanation

The privilege against self-incrimination is a recognized evidentiary protection. Financial hardship, professional seniority, and media coverage are not recognized grounds for refusing testimony.

Question 11Civil Procedure and Evidence

What is the effect of a judgment that has become final in a civil matter on a subsequent lawsuit between the same parties on the same cause of action?

  1. The later suit is automatically transferred to arbitration
  2. The later suit requires the consent of the earlier judge
  3. The later suit proceeds de novo
  4. The later suit is barred by res judicata Correct answer.

Explanation

A final judgment on the merits binds the parties and precludes relitigation of the same cause of action. This is the principle of res judicata. It does not depend on consent or on the identity of the earlier judge.

Question 12Civil Procedure and Evidence

A plaintiff wishes to amend the statement of claim after the defendant has filed a defense. What is the general approach of Israeli courts?

  1. Amendment automatically restarts the limitation period
  2. Amendment is never permitted after the defense
  3. Amendment may be allowed at the court's discretion, considering fairness and prejudice Correct answer.
  4. Amendment requires the defendant's written consent in all cases

Explanation

Courts have discretion to permit amendments to pleadings, weighing factors such as prejudice to the other side and the interests of justice. Amendment is not categorically barred after a defense is filed. It does not automatically reset limitation periods.

Question 13Civil Procedure and Evidence

Which of the following is the correct description of the 'burden of production' as distinct from the 'burden of persuasion'?

  1. The obligation to disclose one's bank records
  2. The obligation to introduce sufficient evidence to raise an issue for the court's consideration Correct answer.
  3. The obligation to attend all hearings
  4. The obligation to pay court fees

Explanation

The burden of production concerns whether enough evidence has been introduced to justify submitting an issue to the trier of fact. The burden of persuasion concerns which party must convince the court. Payment of fees and attendance are procedural duties, not evidentiary burdens.

Question 14Civil Procedure and Evidence

In a civil case, the court is presented with a document whose authenticity is disputed. Who bears the burden of establishing authenticity?

  1. The party who challenges the document
  2. The party who seeks to rely on the document Correct answer.
  3. The court clerk
  4. The opposing counsel personally

Explanation

The party offering a document as evidence must establish the foundation for its admissibility, including authenticity. The challenging party may contest it but does not carry the initial burden. Court staff and counsel personally are not parties bearing this burden.

Question 15Civil Procedure and Evidence

A party seeks to introduce a witness statement prepared for the litigation by a person who will not testify. How should the court treat this?

  1. It is automatically excluded as hearsay
  2. It must be read aloud in open court to be valid
  3. It may be admitted, with weight assessed in light of the absence of cross-examination Correct answer.
  4. It is binding on the court if signed

Explanation

Israeli evidence law does not categorically exclude hearsay; the court may admit the statement and weigh its reliability, considering that the declarant cannot be cross-examined. Signature alone does not make it binding. No formal reading requirement validates it.

Question 16Civil Procedure and Evidence

Which of the following best describes the principle of 'free evaluation of evidence' in Israeli law?

  1. The judge assesses all admissible evidence according to inner conviction and reasoned judgment Correct answer.
  2. The judge must follow a fixed hierarchy of evidence types
  3. The judge must accept documentary evidence over oral testimony
  4. The judge may decide without any reasons

Explanation

Israeli evidence law generally leaves the weighing of evidence to the judge's reasoned assessment rather than a rigid hierarchy. The judge must still give reasons for the factual findings. No fixed rule gives documents automatic priority over testimony.

Question 17Civil Procedure and Evidence

A defendant believes the plaintiff's claim is time-barred. How is the limitation defense typically raised in Israeli civil procedure?

  1. By requesting the court clerk to dismiss the file
  2. By an appeal to the Supreme Court
  3. By a preliminary motion before any defense is filed only
  4. As a defense in the statement of defense Correct answer.

Explanation

Limitation is generally raised as a defense in the responsive pleading, though it may also be addressed at earlier procedural stages where appropriate. It is not a matter for the court clerk, and it is not confined to appeals.

Question 18Civil Procedure and Evidence

Which of the following statements about the admissibility of a confession obtained under improper pressure is most accurate in the Israeli context?

  1. It may be excluded where obtained improperly, particularly in criminal matters Correct answer.
  2. It is admissible only in civil cases
  3. It is always admissible regardless of how it was obtained
  4. It is admissible only if the defendant is represented by counsel

Explanation

Evidence obtained through improper pressure may be excluded, and the rules are especially protective in criminal proceedings. Admissibility is not automatic regardless of the method of obtaining the statement. Representation and the civil/criminal divide are not the operative criteria.

Question 19Civil Procedure and Evidence

In civil proceedings, what is the significance of a party's admission (hoda'ah) of a fact?

  1. It is inadmissible unless made in writing
  2. It is valid only if made before a judge
  3. It is merely a weak form of evidence
  4. It may relieve the opposing party of the need to prove that fact Correct answer.

Explanation

A judicial admission of a fact can relieve the opposing party of the burden of proving that fact. Admissions are not limited to written form or to statements before a judge. They carry significant evidentiary weight.

Question 20Civil Procedure and Evidence

A party wishes to call a witness who is a relative of the opposing party. What is the court's likely approach?

  1. The witness must testify by affidavit only
  2. The witness may testify, and the relationship affects weight, not competence Correct answer.
  3. The witness may testify only with the judge's written permission
  4. The witness is automatically disqualified

Explanation

Relationship to a party generally goes to the weight of testimony rather than to competence. Such a witness is not automatically disqualified. No special written permission or affidavit-only rule applies.

Question 21Civil Procedure and Evidence

Which of the following is the correct characterization of the court's power to order costs in Israeli civil litigation?

  1. Costs are never awarded in civil cases
  2. Costs are fixed by the court clerk without judicial involvement
  3. The court has discretion to allocate costs, generally following the event Correct answer.
  4. Costs are automatically borne by the plaintiff in every case

Explanation

Costs are within the court's discretion, and the general practice is that the losing party bears them, subject to the court's assessment. Costs are not automatically assigned to the plaintiff, nor are they never awarded. The court, not the clerk, decides.

Question 22Civil Procedure and Evidence

A litigant fails to appear at a scheduled hearing without justification. What is the court's likely response?

  1. The court must dismiss the case with prejudice automatically
  2. The court may proceed in the party's absence and draw appropriate procedural consequences Correct answer.
  3. The court must adjourn indefinitely
  4. The court must refer the matter to the police

Explanation

Courts may proceed in a party's absence and impose procedural consequences, which vary with the circumstances. There is no automatic dismissal with prejudice, nor an obligation to adjourn indefinitely. Police referral is not a standard procedural response.

Question 23Civil Procedure and Evidence

Which of the following best describes the treatment of illegally obtained evidence in Israeli civil proceedings?

  1. The court may exclude it where the illegality outweighs its probative value Correct answer.
  2. It is admissible only if the opposing party agrees
  3. It is automatically excluded in every case
  4. It is always admissible, with no judicial discretion

Explanation

Courts retain discretion to exclude evidence obtained unlawfully, balancing probative value against the seriousness of the illegality. Neither automatic admission nor automatic exclusion applies. The opposing party's agreement is not the governing criterion.

Question 24Civil Procedure and Evidence

In a civil action, the court is asked to draw an adverse inference from a party's failure to produce a relevant document within that party's control. What is the correct approach?

  1. The court must order a new trial
  2. The court must ignore the failure entirely
  3. The court may draw an adverse inference where the failure is unexplained Correct answer.
  4. The court must enter judgment against that party automatically

Explanation

Where a party fails to produce relevant material within its control without adequate explanation, the court may infer that the material would not have assisted that party. The inference is discretionary, not automatic judgment, and the failure is not simply ignored.

Question 25Civil Procedure and Evidence

Which of the following statements correctly describes the relationship between the civil standard of proof and the assessment of conflicting testimony?

  1. The court must count the number of witnesses on each side
  2. The court weighs credibility and the overall probability of each version Correct answer.
  3. The court must order a polygraph in every conflict
  4. The court must prefer the plaintiff's witnesses

Explanation

The civil standard requires the court to determine which version is more probable, assessing credibility and the totality of the evidence. The number of witnesses is not determinative. There is no rule preferring the plaintiff's witnesses or mandating polygraphs.

Question 26Civil Procedure and Evidence

In Israeli civil procedure, what is the primary purpose of the statement of claim (ketiv tvi'ah)?

  1. To serve as a formal request for the court to schedule a hearing.
  2. To list the witnesses the plaintiff intends to call at trial.
  3. To set out the facts and legal grounds on which the plaintiff bases the claim and to define the scope of the dispute. Correct answer.
  4. To provide a detailed account of all evidence the plaintiff will present.

Explanation

The statement of claim is the pleading that establishes the plaintiff's case, including the factual and legal basis, and frames the issues for adjudication. It is not intended to be a comprehensive evidentiary list or a mere scheduling request.

Question 27Civil Procedure and Evidence

In an Israeli civil trial, a party wishes to submit a copy of a document. The original is in the possession of a third party who refuses to hand it over. What is the court's likely approach regarding the admissibility of the copy?

  1. The copy may be admitted if the party provides a satisfactory explanation for the absence of the original. Correct answer.
  2. The copy is automatically admissible without any need for explanation.
  3. The copy is inadmissible because the original must always be produced.
  4. The copy is admissible only if the third party consents to its use.

Explanation

Under Israeli evidence law, secondary evidence such as a copy may be admitted when the original is unavailable for a valid reason, such as being held by a non-cooperating third party. The court has discretion to admit the copy if the party accounts for the original's absence.

Question 28Civil Procedure and Evidence

In Israeli civil litigation, what is the effect of a court's decision to accept a late-filed statement of defense?

  1. The trial will automatically proceed as if the defense had not been filed.
  2. The court may impose sanctions on the defendant for the delay, but the defense will be heard. Correct answer.
  3. The defendant waives the right to appeal the final judgment.
  4. The defendant is considered to have admitted all allegations in the statement of claim.

Explanation

Israeli courts have discretion to accept late pleadings while imposing appropriate sanctions, such as costs, to address the delay. The defense is not automatically struck, and the defendant does not lose the right to be heard.

Question 29Civil Procedure and Evidence

In Israeli civil procedure, which of the following best describes the principle of 'relativity of evidence' (ishiyut ha-re'ayot)?

  1. Evidence is admissible only if it is relevant to the issues in the case.
  2. Evidence must be presented in the presence of all parties to be admissible.
  3. Evidence obtained from a witness is admissible only against the party who called that witness. Correct answer.
  4. Evidence is evaluated based on its reliability and weight, not its source.

Explanation

The principle of relativity of evidence generally means that evidence is admissible only against the party against whom it is offered, and not against other parties who were not involved in its creation. This principle helps prevent unfair prejudice to parties who had no opportunity to contest the evidence.

Question 30Civil Procedure and Evidence

In an Israeli civil action, the plaintiff submits an affidavit from a witness who is abroad and unavailable to testify. The defendant objects, arguing that the witness cannot be cross-examined. How should the court rule on the admissibility of the affidavit?

  1. The affidavit is inadmissible because it violates the right to cross-examine.
  2. The affidavit is admissible if the witness's absence is justified and the defendant had an opportunity to cross-examine via other means, such as written questions. Correct answer.
  3. The affidavit is automatically admissible without any conditions.
  4. The affidavit is admissible only if the witness is a party to the case.

Explanation

Israeli courts may admit hearsay evidence, including affidavits, when the witness is unavailable and the opposing party has had a fair opportunity to challenge the evidence, for example through written cross-examination. The right to cross-examine is not absolute and can be accommodated through alternative means.

Question 31Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

Under Israeli contract law, which of the following is an essential element for the formation of a binding contract?

  1. Registration of the agreement with a notary
  2. Payment of a deposit by the buyer
  3. Offer and acceptance reflecting a meeting of minds Correct answer.
  4. Approval of the agreement by a court

Explanation

A contract is formed by offer and acceptance that produce a genuine meeting of intentions (gemirat da'at). No notarization, deposit, or judicial approval is required for formation as such.

Question 32Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

In Israeli tort law, the tort of negligence generally requires proof of which elements?

  1. Intent to cause the harm and actual malice
  2. A duty of care, breach, and a causal link to damage Correct answer.
  3. Strict liability regardless of fault
  4. A written contract between the parties

Explanation

Negligence under the Civil Wrongs Ordinance requires a duty of care, a breach of the reasonable standard, and causation of damage. Intent is not an element of negligence.

Question 33Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

Which of the following best describes the principle of good faith in Israeli contract law?

  1. Parties must act honestly and fairly in negotiating and performing a contract Correct answer.
  2. Good faith applies only to consumer contracts
  3. Good faith overrides every express term of the contract automatically
  4. Parties may act solely in their own interest as long as they do not breach an express term

Explanation

Israeli law imposes a general duty of good faith in negotiation and performance of contracts. It is a broad standard of honest and fair conduct, not limited to consumer transactions.

Question 34Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

A property owner discovers that a neighbor has been crossing her land daily for many years without permission. Under Israeli law, which concept is most relevant to whether the neighbor may acquire a right to continue crossing?

  1. Adverse possession of registered land by mere trespass
  2. Eminent domain
  3. Zoning by the planning authority
  4. Prescription (acquisition of rights by long use) Correct answer.

Explanation

Long, continuous use of another's land may give rise to prescriptive rights under the relevant rules. The question of whether such a right crystallizes turns on the statutory conditions of prescription.

Question 35Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

Which of the following constitutes a valid acceptance of an offer under Israeli contract law?

  1. An internal, uncommunicated intention to accept
  2. Silence in all circumstances
  3. A counter-offer that changes a material term
  4. A clear response communicated to the offeror manifesting assent Correct answer.

Explanation

Acceptance must be communicated to the offeror and manifest assent to the offer. A counter-offer operates as a rejection and a new offer, and uncommunicated intent is ineffective.

Question 36Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

In Israeli tort law, which of the following is a recognized defense that may reduce or negate a defendant's liability for negligence?

  1. The injured party's foreign citizenship
  2. Absence of a written warning
  3. Contributory fault of the injured party Correct answer.
  4. Lack of insurance coverage

Explanation

Contributory fault of the injured party is a recognized factor that may reduce the defendant's liability. Insurance status, warnings, and citizenship are not defenses to negligence.

Question 37Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

Which statement correctly describes the Israeli rule on remedies for breach of contract?

  1. The injured party is generally entitled to expectation damages placing it in the position it would have occupied had the contract been performed Correct answer.
  2. The injured party is limited to restitution of what it paid
  3. The injured party may always recover punitive damages
  4. Specific performance is available in every case as of right

Explanation

The primary contractual remedy is expectation damages aimed at putting the injured party in the position of performance. Punitive damages are exceptional, and specific performance is discretionary.

Question 38Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

Regarding the transfer of ownership of movable property under Israeli law, which principle generally applies?

  1. Ownership generally passes by agreement between the parties, subject to the statutory rules Correct answer.
  2. Ownership never passes without court approval
  3. Ownership passes only upon registration in a public register
  4. Ownership passes only upon physical delivery in every case

Explanation

For movables, the transfer of ownership generally follows the parties' agreement, subject to the statutory framework governing transfer. Registration is central for land, not ordinary movables.

Question 39Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

A party wishes to cancel a contract because it was induced to enter it by the other party's fraudulent misrepresentation. Which statement best reflects Israeli law?

  1. The contract is automatically void without any action by the deceived party
  2. The deceived party may generally cancel the contract and may also claim damages Correct answer.
  3. Fraud is irrelevant if the contract was in writing
  4. The deceived party may only claim damages and cannot cancel

Explanation

Fraudulent misrepresentation is a ground for rescission (cancellation) and also supports a damages claim. The contract is voidable at the instance of the deceived party rather than automatically void.

Question 40Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

Which of the following is the correct description of the tort of trespass to land?

  1. Any use of land that reduces its market value
  2. Failure to pay municipal property tax
  3. A breach of a planning permit
  4. An unjustified entry onto land in another's possession Correct answer.

Explanation

Trespass to land involves unjustified physical entry onto land possessed by another. It protects possession and does not require proof of diminished value.

Question 41Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

Under Israeli law, when may a court order specific performance of a contract?

  1. When damages would not adequately remedy the breach and the court exercises its discretion to grant it Correct answer.
  2. Automatically whenever the plaintiff requests it
  3. Never, because damages are the exclusive remedy
  4. Only in contracts for the sale of goods

Explanation

Specific performance is a discretionary equitable remedy granted where damages are inadequate, such as in certain contracts concerning unique property. It is not automatic and is not limited to goods.

Question 42Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

Which of the following best describes the doctrine of frustration of contract in Israeli law?

  1. A party may cancel merely because it changed its mind
  2. A party may be released when an unforeseen event makes performance impossible or fundamentally different from what was contemplated Correct answer.
  3. A party is always released when performance becomes more expensive
  4. Frustration applies only to employment contracts

Explanation

Frustration addresses supervening events that make performance impossible or radically different from what the parties contemplated. Mere increased cost or change of mind does not qualify.

Question 43Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

In Israeli tort law, when is a person vicariously liable for the torts of another?

  1. Only when the tortfeasor is a family member
  2. Never, because liability is always personal
  3. When a recognized relationship such as employer and employee exists and the tort was committed in the course of that relationship Correct answer.
  4. Whenever the other person acted without insurance

Explanation

Vicarious liability arises from recognized relationships, most notably where an employer is liable for an employee's torts committed in the course of employment. It is not limited to family relationships.

Question 44Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

Which of the following statements about the registration of land in Israel is correct?

  1. Registration in the land register is generally the mechanism by which rights in land are established and protected against third parties Correct answer.
  2. Land rights are established solely by physical occupation
  3. Registration is optional and has no effect on third parties
  4. Only the seller's signature is needed to protect a buyer against third parties

Explanation

The Israeli land registration system (Tabu) generally determines and protects rights in land against third parties. Unregistered interests are vulnerable to later registered claims.

Question 45Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

A contract contains a clause exempting one party from all liability for any breach. Under Israeli law, how is such an exemption clause generally treated?

  1. It is always enforced exactly as written
  2. It is automatically void in every contract
  3. It is valid only if approved by a court
  4. It is interpreted narrowly and may be limited or invalidated where it conflicts with mandatory law or public policy Correct answer.

Explanation

Exemption clauses are construed restrictively and are subject to mandatory statutory provisions and public policy limits. They are not automatically void but are not always enforced as written.

Question 46Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

Which of the following is a recognized ground for rescission of a contract under Israeli law?

  1. Duress exerted by the other party to obtain consent Correct answer.
  2. A subsequent rise in market prices
  3. The promisor's later change of mind
  4. The absence of a notary's signature

Explanation

Duress vitiates free consent and provides a ground for rescission. Market changes and later regret are not grounds, and notarization is not generally required.

Question 47Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

In Israeli tort law, which of the following best describes the tort of defamation?

  1. A truthful statement that the subject finds embarrassing
  2. A private thought never communicated to anyone
  3. Publication of a false statement that lowers a person in the eyes of others, subject to statutory defenses Correct answer.
  4. Any statement that the subject dislikes

Explanation

Defamation requires publication of a defamatory statement, and the statutory framework provides specific defenses such as truth. A private uncommunicated thought is not publication.

Question 48Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

What is the effect of a condition precedent in a contract?

  1. The condition converts the contract into a tort claim
  2. The obligation becomes enforceable only once the stipulated event occurs Correct answer.
  3. The contract is void from the outset
  4. The obligation is immediately enforceable regardless of the event

Explanation

A condition precedent suspends enforceability until the specified event occurs. The contract exists but performance or enforcement awaits the condition.

Question 49Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

Which statement correctly reflects the Israeli rule on the assignment of contractual rights?

  1. A party may generally assign its rights to a third party unless the contract or its nature prohibits assignment or the obligor's position is materially affected Correct answer.
  2. Only courts may assign contractual rights
  3. Assignment automatically extinguishes the original contract
  4. Assignment is never permitted without the debtor's consent in every case

Explanation

Contractual rights are generally assignable unless prohibited or unless assignment would materially prejudice the obligor. Assignment does not extinguish the underlying contract.

Question 50Substantive Civil Law (Contracts, Torts, Property, Obligations)

Under Israeli law, which of the following is required for a valid will concerning real property?

  1. Registration of the will in the land register during the testator's lifetime
  2. Compliance with the statutory form requirements for wills Correct answer.
  3. Approval by all heirs
  4. A notarized valuation of the property

Explanation

A will must satisfy the statutory formalities to be valid. Registration during the testator's lifetime and heirs' approval are not conditions of validity.