COTA Skilled Nursing: Dementia, Night Wandering, and a Family Request for Restraints
Mrs. L is an 84-year-old woman with moderate Alzheimer's disease admitted to a skilled nursing facility after a urinary tract infection and a fall at home. She ambulates 20 feet with a rolling walker and standby assistance but has begun wandering at night into other residents' rooms. She does not remember to use her call light and has attempted to stand without help twice. OT evaluation shows she can feed herself with setup, needs moderate assistance for dressing and bathing, and cannot sequence donning her shoes. Her daughter is involved and asks the team to 'use a restraint at night so she doesn't fall.' The facility has a restraint-reduction policy. There is no one-to-one sitter at night. The nursing team asks OT for a plan to address safety, activity, and family concerns.
1. How should the team respond to the daughter's request for a restraint, and what alternatives should be prioritized?
Read the worked answer
Acknowledge the daughter's fear, then explain that a restraint is not an appropriate first-line response and may increase agitation, injury, and functional decline. Restraints require a specific order, monitoring, and justification, and the facility has a restraint-reduction policy. The team should first assess why Mrs. L wanders: pain, need to toilet, hunger, thirst, infection effects, constipation, boredom, or sundowning. Address those causes and implement least-restrictive alternatives: a predictable night routine, toileting before bed, a snack, night lights, door alarms or bed alarms per facility policy, safe wandering paths, and meaningful evening activity. Ensure her walker is accessible and the call light is within reach, though she may not remember it. Increase nighttime checks and consider room placement near the nurses' station. Educate the daughter about the plan and invite her to provide familiar items or a recorded voice. The goal is safety and dignity, not immobility. If risks persist, the team should reassess rather than default to restraint.
2. What activity analysis and environmental modifications should the COTA implement under the OTR's plan?
Read the worked answer
Analyze the nighttime routine step by step: evening medication, dinner, toileting, changing, settling in bed, and nighttime awakenings. Identify where Mrs. L becomes anxious or attempts to stand. Modify the environment with night lights, clear pathways, remove clutter and throw rugs, place the walker beside the bed, and use visual cues for the bathroom if appropriate. Provide a calm evening activity and a consistent bedtime routine. During the day, increase physical activity and social contact to reduce nighttime restlessness. For dressing and shoe donning, use sequenced setup and verbal cues rather than doing everything for her. The COTA should collect data on wandering times, triggers, falls, and response to modifications. Any bed or door alarm must follow facility policy and should be used as a monitoring tool, not a substitute for care. Report patterns to the OTR and nursing so the plan can be revised.
3. How should the COTA document this situation, and what should be escalated to the OTR or nursing?
Read the worked answer
Document objective observations: when wandering occurs, where she goes, how she responds to redirection, what she says, whether pain or toileting seems related, and what interventions were tried. Record the daughter's concerns and the education provided, without documenting the request as if a restraint were approved. Note Mrs. L's functional performance and any changes in cognition or mobility. Escalate to the OTR if the plan is not working, if new functional changes appear, or if the COTA needs to modify goals. Escalate to nursing immediately for fall attempts, injury, signs of infection, pain, or unsafe nighttime events. The COTA should not independently decide to use a restraint or alarm; those are team and facility decisions. The OTR should reassess the occupational performance and safety plan. Clear documentation protects the resident and shows that the team used least-restrictive measures before considering any restrictive intervention.