The Report That Says “Uncooperative” but Not What Happened
You are a probationary trooper reviewing your own draft narrative 45 minutes before end of shift. The call was a 2147 domestic disturbance at 418 Elm Street, apartment 3B. Your draft reads: “On 03/14 at approximately 2145 hrs, I responded to a residence on Elm Street reference a disturbance. Upon arrival, I observed a male subject who was uncooperative and appeared to have been drinking. The female subject stated they had an argument. The male was placed under arrest for domestic battery. Report to follow.” Your notes show: male, 34, female, 31, married; the female had a red mark on her left forearm; the male said, “She hit me first”; no Miranda yet; a neighbor heard yelling; no photos taken. The shift log shows you arrived at 2152. Your supervisor wants a corrected narrative before approval.
1. Identify at least three facts missing from the draft that a reader needs in order to understand the incident and the legal basis for the arrest. For each, explain why its absence creates a comprehension or review problem.
Read the worked answer
The draft is long on conclusions and short on observable facts. Three critical gaps are:
- Identities and relationship. The draft never names or ages the parties or states that they are married. A reader cannot tell who is who, whether the domestic-battery relationship element is present, or which person made which statement.
- The injury and its source. “Domestic battery” is a legal conclusion. The report needs the observable fact: a red mark on the female’s left forearm, where it was, what she said caused it, and whether she complained of pain. Without that, a reviewer cannot assess probable cause.
- The male’s statement and the investigation step. The male said, “She hit me first.” That is both a denial and an accusation. The report must say who said it, when, and what follow-up occurred. It should also note that no Miranda warning had been given and no photos were taken, so the supervisor knows what still must be done.
Other gaps include the arrival time, the neighbor’s account, and the lack of any description of the male’s condition beyond “appeared to have been drinking.” Each gap forces the reader to guess, and guessing is not a review standard.
2. Rewrite the first three sentences of the narrative so they use observable facts rather than conclusory labels. Keep it under 80 words and preserve chronology.
Read the worked answer
A defensible rewrite is:
“On 03/14 at 2147 hrs, I was dispatched to 418 Elm St., Apt. 3B, for a domestic disturbance. I arrived at 2152 hrs and met a 34-year-old male and a 31-year-old female who identified themselves as married. The female had a visible red mark on her left forearm. The male stated, ‘She hit me first.’ A neighbor in Apt. 3A stated she heard yelling.”
Why this works: it replaces “uncooperative” with nothing, because the draft never says what the male did that was uncooperative. It replaces “appeared to have been drinking” with no conclusion, because the draft gives no slurred speech, odor, balance problem, or admission. It identifies the parties, the relationship, the injury, the statement, and the neighbor. It also preserves the dispatch-to-arrival sequence, which matters for response-time review. If the male’s intoxication is relevant, the revised narrative should add specific observations, such as an odor of alcoholic beverage, slurred speech, or an admission-not a label.
3. The phrase “Report to follow” appears at the end. Explain the practical problem it creates for a supervisor, prosecutor, or records reviewer, and state what you should do instead before submitting.
Read the worked answer
“Report to follow” signals that the document is incomplete. A supervisor cannot approve a narrative that may change; a prosecutor may have to request a supplement before charging; and a records reviewer cannot tell whether the missing information was never gathered or merely omitted. It also creates an appearance problem: the report is the official record, and a placeholder suggests the officer intended to fill it in later without documenting when or why.
Before submitting, you should either complete the narrative or write a specific supplement that identifies exactly what remains outstanding-for example, “Supplement to follow regarding photographs of the female’s left forearm and the neighbor’s recorded statement.” Then notify the supervisor of the outstanding items and the reason. Do not submit a vague promise. If policy requires photos and they were not taken, document why and what corrective step was taken. The goal is a record that a stranger can read without asking what happened next.