Retirement Withdrawal and Sequence Risk
James, 63, plans to retire in 12 months. His portfolio is $1.8 million: $1.26 million in a 401(k) allocated 70% equities and 30% bonds, $310,000 in a taxable brokerage account with a $95,000 unrealized gain in a single technology stock, and $230,000 in a Roth IRA. He needs $105,000 per year before tax. Social Security at full retirement age 67 would be $34,000; at 70 it would be $42,000. He has a 25-year horizon, moderate risk tolerance, and wants to delay Social Security to 70. His adviser recommends selling the technology stock immediately and raising the 401(k) bond allocation to 50%. James asks whether he can retire at 63 rather than 64. Inflation is 3.2%, and the portfolio's expected nominal return is 5.8%.
1. Can James retire at 63? Use a simple sustainability check and discuss sequence-of-returns risk.
Read the worked answer
$105,000 / $1.8 million = 5.83% initial withdrawal rate, well above the 4% rule of thumb. Delaying Social Security to 70 means no benefit for seven years, so the portfolio must fund the full $105,000 during that bridge. In real terms, with a 5.8% nominal return and 3.2% inflation, the real return is about 2.6%. If withdrawals grow with inflation, the portfolio is likely to be depleted before age 88 unless returns are favorable. A simple stress test: two consecutive years of -10% returns at the start would reduce the balance to about $1.46 million while withdrawals continue; the subsequent required return rises. So the answer is 'not safely' at 63. Options: work one more year, reduce spending to $85,000, or claim Social Security at 67 instead of 70. Sequence risk is the key: early losses are more damaging than later ones because withdrawals lock in losses.
2. Evaluate the adviser's recommendation to sell the technology stock immediately and raise the 401(k) bond allocation to 50%.
Read the worked answer
Selling the tech stock immediately triggers a $95,000 gain. At 20% federal + 3.8% NIIT + state (say 5%), tax is about $27,300, leaving $67,700 to reinvest. That may be acceptable to reduce single-stock risk, but the stock is only 17% of the taxable account and 5.3% of the total portfolio, not an emergency. A staged sale over two tax years could reduce tax. Raising bonds to 50% in the 401(k) lowers expected return at a time when the withdrawal rate is already high; it may reduce volatility but increase depletion risk. Better: keep the 401(k) at 60/40 or 65/35, place bonds in the 401(k) for tax efficiency, and hold equities in the Roth and taxable accounts. The tech stock sale should be coordinated with the withdrawal plan, not done reflexively.
3. Propose a Social Security claiming strategy and a withdrawal sequencing plan.
Read the worked answer
Delaying to 70 maximizes the inflation-adjusted benefit ($42,000 vs $34,000 at 67) and provides longevity insurance. But the bridge cost is high. A hybrid: claim at 67 if the portfolio stress test fails, or delay to 70 if James works one more year or cuts spending. Withdrawal sequencing: use taxable account dividends and cash first, then sell taxable securities with highest basis, then 401(k) withdrawals up to the top of the 12% or 22% bracket, and preserve the Roth for late-life or heirs. Do not take 401(k) distributions before 59 1/2 (he is 63, so okay). Use the 401(k) for required minimum distributions at 73. Rebalance inside the 401(k) to avoid taxable events. Review annually.