The Muted WhatsApp Group
Silchar Study Circle is a higher-secondary coaching institute with 22 faculty members. Its principal fixes every timetable, fee slab and test schedule alone. Faculty meetings are used only to announce decisions, and complaints are posted in a WhatsApp group that the principal has muted. Salaries are 15 per cent above the local market and the institute pays festival bonuses, yet 9 of 22 faculty left last year. Exit interviews, which the principal did not read, mention “no say”, “no feedback” and “public scolding”. Two senior faculty were passed over for coordinator posts without explanation. Attendance in classes is still good, but the pass percentage in accountancy fell from 92 to 74. The principal has budgeted ₹1.5 lakh for retention and believes “people only leave for money”.
1. Using Maslow's need hierarchy, explain why the 15 per cent salary premium has not retained faculty.
Read the worked answer
Maslow's hierarchy explains the gap:
- Physiological and safety needs are met by salary 15% above market and festival bonuses. Once these are satisfied, more of the same has limited motivational effect.
- Social/belonging needs are not met: meetings are announcements, the WhatsApp group is muted, and faculty have no team voice.
- Esteem needs are actively damaged: public scolding, no feedback, and senior faculty passed over for coordinator posts without explanation. Being passed over is read as a judgement on competence.
- Self-actualisation is blocked: the principal fixes timetables, fee slabs and tests, so faculty have no say in their own work.
The exit interviews name “no say”, “no feedback” and “public scolding” - all higher-order needs, not pay. A salary premium cannot compensate for esteem and autonomy deficits; it may even raise expectations. The principal's belief that “people only leave for money” is contradicted by the evidence.
2. Identify the leadership style in use and the communication barriers present. Recommend a style and two communication changes.
Read the worked answer
Leadership style: autocratic. The principal decides alone and uses meetings to announce decisions.
Communication barriers:
- One-way downward communication with no upward channel; muting the WhatsApp group blocks feedback.
- Psychological barrier: fear of public scolding stops faculty from raising problems.
- Lack of feedback: faculty get no information on performance, so they cannot improve.
- Organisational barrier: promotion decisions are unexplained, which breeds rumour and perceived favouritism.
Recommendation: democratic/participative style, retaining final authority but consulting before decisions.
Two changes:
- Hold a weekly 30-minute faculty meeting with a written agenda and minutes. Timetable and test-schedule proposals are tabled before decisions are taken, so faculty see their input being used.
- Introduce a monthly one-to-one feedback meeting plus an anonymous suggestion channel, with a stated rule that performance issues are never raised in front of colleagues. This addresses both the esteem deficit and the fear barrier at low cost.
3. How should the ₹1.5 lakh retention budget be spent? Give a reasoned plan with at least three non-financial measures.
Read the worked answer
First, test the money option: 22 faculty at an average ₹25,000 a month cost about ₹66 lakh a year. Even a 2% across-the-board rise costs about ₹1.32 lakh, nearly the whole budget, and the evidence says pay is not the problem. Spend on non-financial incentives instead.
Plan for ₹1.5 lakh:
- Job enrichment and recognition - ₹60,000: create two coordinator posts with an allowance of ₹2,500 a month for 12 months, with published selection criteria. This addresses esteem and creates a career path.
- Autonomy - no cash cost: let faculty set internal test papers and choose teaching methods within a common syllabus, meeting self-actualisation needs.
- Feedback and training - ₹48,000: peer observation and one external workshop (₹4,000 × 12 sessions), plus the monthly one-to-one meetings.
- Recognition - ₹24,000: half-yearly awards, certificates and a staff noticeboard; low cost, visible esteem.
- Workplace - ₹18,000: staff room improvement, tea/water, and a small wellness fund.
Total: ₹1,50,000. Publish the plan, review attrition after six months, and link the coordinator allowances to a clear term so the budget remains sustainable.