The Nod That Protected the Reserve
Rob owns Northgate Auction Co. and is the licensed auctioneer for the estate of a Fulton County farmer. The written consignment sets a $22,000 reserve on a 1978 John Deere 4440 and gives Rob a 15% commission plus a 10% buyer's premium. On sale day the tractor stalls at $18,500. Rob's brother-in-law, Paul, is standing near the ring; Rob catches his eye and gives a small nod, and Paul bids $22,000. No one bids again and Rob knocks the tractor down to Paul, announcing "sold for twenty-two thousand." Paul never pays. Three weeks later the tractor is still in the barn and the estate's attorney is asking why the settlement shows a $22,000 sale. Separately, Rob wants a 1954 Ford F-100 in the same sale for himself and has his clerk bid on it from the back of the room without announcing anything. The estate's other 240 lots sold normally and are already paid for.
1. Analyze the $22,000 bid. Why is it a problem, and what were the legitimate options when the tractor stalled at $18,500?
Read the worked answer
The $22,000 bid was not an offer to buy anything. It was placed at Rob's signal for the single purpose of pushing the price to the reserve, and every bidder in the ring was meant to believe a stranger wanted the tractor at that number. That is a fictitious or protective bid - a shill bid - and it is the classic prohibited practice in auction law: bids may only be taken from a person who actually intends to buy at that price. Rob both arranged it and accepted it, so he cannot claim he was fooled.
Why it matters beyond the rulebook: the bidders at $18,500 and below were deceived about demand, and the estate was deceived about the market. The settlement would have recorded a $22,000 sale that never happened, which is a misrepresentation to the personal representative.
The correct handling when the tractor stalled was short and unglamorous: announce "the reserve has not been met," pass the lot, and then work the phones. Rob could have gone to the seller for authority to drop the reserve to $18,500 and re-opened the bidding with the change announced; he could have taken the high bidder aside and negotiated after the sale; he could have carried the tractor to a later sale. All three are legitimate. None requires a fake bid.
If a seller ever asks for a protective bid, the answer is no - in writing, with an explanation that the practice exposes both of them to fraud claims and license discipline.
2. Can Rob buy the 1954 Ford F-100 at his own sale through his clerk? Set out what a lawful self-purchase would require and what goes wrong with the clerk's silent bidding.
Read the worked answer
Not the way it is set up. An auctioneer is the seller's agent, and buying the seller's property for himself is the clearest form of self-dealing. Having his own clerk bid from the back of the room without announcement is worse - it looks exactly like the shill bid he just took, and a bidder who learns the buyer was the auctioneer's stand-in has a fraud argument.
A lawful self-purchase, where the contract permits it at all, requires:
- Written disclosure to the seller before the sale that the auctioneer intends to bid on specific lots, with the seller's written consent.
- A different licensed auctioneer on the block for those lots, so the person accepting the bid is not the person making it.
- Open bidding. The auctioneer's bid is announced as the auctioneer's bid - no clerk, no proxy, no signals.
- No informational edge. No use of reserve figures other bidders do not have, and no last-minute reordering of the catalog to favor him.
Practically, many auctioneers avoid buying at their own sales altogether because the disclosure and optics burden outweighs the deal. If Rob wants the F-100, the cleanest path is to have a colleague handle that lot, or to buy it after the sale at a price negotiated with the seller and documented in writing.
3. Paul never pays for the tractor. What does Rob owe the estate now, and what should the settlement show?
Read the worked answer
He has to tell the seller, and he has to do it in writing and immediately.
Paul's $22,000 was not a sale. No money changed hands, the tractor never left the barn, and there is no buyer. Three consequences follow:
- No commission. Rob may not charge the estate a 15% commission or a 10% premium on a transaction that did not occur. If the settlement shows a $22,000 sale, that is a misstatement to the personal representative and potentially to the court supervising the estate.
- Full disclosure of why. The seller is entitled to know that the bid came from Rob's relative at Rob's signal. Softening it - or calling it "a bidder who defaulted" - layers a second misrepresentation on the first.
- An honest path forward. The tractor is unsold and still needs to be sold. Rob should propose a re-offer at a date certain, reopen the reserve conversation, and expect the estate to want a different auctioneer for that lot.
Rob should also correct his own records now: void the invoice, document the resale or re-consignment, and keep the file. He should assume the estate's attorney will ask the obvious follow-up - how many other times has a family member been in the ring? Discipline for the fictitious bid and the unannounced self-dealing is likely regardless of how the tractor ultimately sells.