Bihar Police SI study materials
Bihar Police SI study resources

Vetting an English Press Note Before Newspaper Publication

Bihar Police SI · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Vetting an English Press Note Before Newspaper Publication

A sub-inspector drafts a press note on a recovery of a country-made pistol at a bus stand and sends it for vetting before release to three newspapers. The draft reads: 'Acting on a tip-off, a raid was conducted by the police at the new bus stand, and one person was apprehended with a country-made pistol and four live cartridges. The accused, who was previously involved in two cases of theft, he was produced before the magistrate in the afternoon. Police said the accused has been arrested and further investigation is going on. The public is requested to not believe in rumours.' The vetting officer has three concerns: the opening sentence, the legal weight of the words used for the person, and the demand of the family that the note must not name him. The note will be quoted verbatim by newspapers, so every word carries legal consequence.

1. Identify the fault in the opening sentence, correct it, and state the rule that is broken.

Read the worked answer

The fault is a dangling participial phrase. 'Acting on a tip-off' is meant to describe the police, but as written it attaches to 'a raid', producing the absurd meaning that the raid acted on a tip-off. A participial phrase must modify the subject of the main clause, and here the subject is 'a raid', which cannot act.

The rule is simply that the doer named at the start of the sentence must be the doer of the main verb. Two clean corrections are possible:

  • 'Acting on a tip-off, the police conducted a raid at the new bus stand and arrested one person carrying a country-made pistol and four live cartridges.'
  • 'On a tip-off, a raid was conducted at the new bus stand by the police, and one person was arrested with a country-made pistol and four live cartridges.'

The first is better for a press note because it names the actor early and uses the active voice, which reads as a straightforward account of what the police did rather than an impersonal bureaucratic passive. Note also that 'apprehended' has been replaced by 'arrested', which the next question deals with.

2. Explain the difference in legal weight between 'apprehended', 'detained' and 'arrested', and say which word this note must use and why.

Read the worked answer

'Apprehended' is a general English word for catching someone; it has no fixed legal content and tells the reader nothing about the person's status. 'Detained' means held for questioning or inquiry without a formal arrest, and it carries its own limited safeguards and a shorter permissible period. 'Arrested' is a term of art: it is a formal act that triggers specific consequences - the grounds must be communicated, a relative or friend must be informed, the arrest must be recorded, and the person must be produced before a magistrate within the prescribed period.

This note must use 'arrested' consistently, since the draft itself says the person was produced before the magistrate, which presupposes a formal arrest. Using 'apprehended' in one sentence and 'arrested' in the next describes a single event with two different legal labels and invites the defence to argue that the note contradicts itself. The correction is not merely stylistic: the word chosen fixes the date and time from which the arrest safeguards run, and a newspaper quoting 'apprehended' would misinform the public about the stage of the case.

3. Fix the pronoun repetition and the two usage errors, then rewrite the whole note in formal register in not more than four sentences, keeping the accused unnamed.

Read the worked answer

The pronoun repetition is in 'The accused, who was previously involved in two cases of theft, he was produced before the magistrate'. The relative clause already has 'who' as its subject, so the separate 'he' duplicates it. Correct form: 'The accused, who was previously involved in two cases of theft, was produced before the magistrate.'

The usage errors are 'believe in rumours', which should be 'believe rumours' (the verb here takes a direct object), and 'going on', which is colloquial for an official note and should be 'under way' or 'continuing'.

Rewritten note: 'Acting on a tip-off, the police conducted a raid at the new bus stand and arrested one person carrying a country-made pistol and four live cartridges. The accused, who was earlier involved in two cases of theft, was produced before the magistrate in the afternoon. The police said investigation was under way and added that the public should not believe rumours.' The accused is described only as 'the accused', which satisfies the family's request and also protects the department: naming a person who has not been convicted creates a needless defamation risk, and no public purpose is served by the name in a recovery note of this kind.