Rating Override for a Single-Buyer Agri-Processor
An agri-processing SME with revenue of 3.2bn is rated 4 (acceptable) on the bank's 8-grade scale, based on a quantitative score of 62/100. The analyst proposes a two-notch downgrade to 6 (special mention). The company sells 65% of output to one off-taker that has delayed payments by 60 days twice in the past year. Raw material is 70% of cost of sales and is not hedged. Current ratio is 1.15, quick ratio 0.55, EBITDA 410m, interest expense 180m, total debt 1.9bn, and DSCR 1.3x. The founder, aged 68, has no succession plan. Rating policy permits a one-notch qualitative override with documented rationale; a two-notch override requires rating committee approval. The relationship manager argues the scorecard already captures financial risk and that a two-notch move would trigger a 50% provision increase and restrict new lending.
1. Assess whether a two-notch override is justified, explaining how the qualitative factors interact with the quantitative score.
Read the worked answer
Two-notch override is justified on risk grounds. The quantitative score of 62 maps to grade 4, but the scorecard likely weights historical financials and may not fully capture correlated concentration and governance risks. The 65% single-buyer dependence combined with 60-day payment delays means a single counterparty can trigger a liquidity crisis; with quick ratio 0.55 and DSCR 1.3x, the borrower has little buffer. Raw material at 70% of cost of sales without hedging creates margin volatility. Founder age 68 with no succession adds key-person and continuity risk. These are not independent: a delay by the off-taker would force short-term borrowing just as commodity prices rise, tightening liquidity and breaching covenants. A one-notch move to grade 5 may understate the cumulative risk. A two-notch move to grade 6 is defensible, but it must be approved by the rating committee, not by the relationship manager. The provision impact is a consequence, not a reason to avoid the rating.
2. Recommend the rating, conditions, and rating committee documentation needed.
Read the worked answer
Recommend grade 6 (special mention), subject to conditions and committee approval. Conditions: diversify so no buyer exceeds 50% of sales within 12 months; hedge at least 50% of raw-material exposure; maintain DSCR >=1.4x and current ratio >=1.2x; no dividends or related-party loans; provide a succession plan and key-person insurance; monthly borrowing base and 13-week cash-flow forecast; quarterly re-rating. The rating committee pack should include: the scorecard output and each override reason; sensitivity of DSCR to a 60-day payment delay and a 20% commodity price rise; mitigating factors; exit strategy; and provision impact. The RM should not trade a lower rating for new lending. If the borrower refuses conditions, retain grade 6 and reduce exposure. Document dissent if the RM disagrees.