Two Sources on the 1930 Salt Satyagraha in a Coastal Town
In April 1930 a coastal Andhra town of about 18,000 people saw a salt satyagraha. Three sources survive. Source A, a police intelligence report: 'About 2,000 persons, mostly labourers and weavers, assembled near the salt depot; the crowd was dispersed after 14 arrests. The leaders are outsiders. Local traders took no part.' Source B, a Telugu weekly of the same week: 'Merchants of the bazaar shut their shops; women of respectable households gave their silver to the volunteers; weavers pledged not to buy foreign yarn; the procession numbered 5,000.' Source C, the collector's fortnightly report: 62 cloth shops in the town shut for two days, and sales at the municipal salt depot fell by 40 per cent that month, which the collector attributes to the price of imported salt. A student must write an essay on 'the social base of the Civil Disobedience Movement in coastal Andhra'.
1. Assess the reliability of each source using provenance, purpose and audience, and identify which claims are corroborated.
Read the worked answer
Ask what each writer was trying to achieve. The police report went to superiors whose measure of success was public order, so its interest is to show that the disturbance was small and confined to the 'lower orders' and that respectable traders stayed away. That does not make it false, but it makes its numbers a floor and its claim about traders suspect. It is nevertheless strong on specifics that can be checked: 14 arrests, a named place, a date.
The Telugu weekly was mobilising readers. Its purpose was to enlarge the movement, so 5,000 is likely inflated against 2,000, and 'women of respectable households' is a claim about status as much as a fact. Its value is in the specific pledges - shops shut, weavers refusing foreign yarn - which can be tested against other records.
The collector was writing an administrative account, not propaganda, and had access to municipal records. His report corroborates the shop closure and gives a number, 62 shops. He also gives a rival explanation for the salt sales fall, which a careful student must weigh rather than dismiss.
Corroborated: the assembly, the arrests, and a substantial closure of cloth shops. Uncorroborated: the size of the crowd and the donation of silver.
2. What conclusion about the social base of the movement is defensible from these sources, and what evidence would you need to decide whether merchants supported it or were coerced?
Read the worked answer
Defensible conclusion: the movement in this town drew on weavers and labourers, and also on sections of the bazaar merchant class, since the closure of 62 cloth shops is confirmed by an official who had no reason to magnify it. Women's participation is plausible but rests on one mobilising source, so the essay should call it probable, not established. The claim that traders took no part cannot stand against the collector's figure.
The harder question is motive. A shop that shuts may be expressing sympathy, obeying a picket, or protecting itself from a crowd. To separate these, look for: municipal or octroi records showing which shops shut and for how long, and whether large or small firms shut first; police records of picketing and of prosecutions of pickets; merchant association minutes and subscription lists; and later testimony or memoir material from the traders themselves.
A useful comparison is another town where the movement was weak. If shops there also shut, the closure is about the crowd, not the cause. If the pattern of closure follows the pattern of picketing, coercion is the better explanation. Until that is done, the essay should say the merchant class was involved and leave the motive open.
3. Why is the collector's economic data more useful for measuring participation than either narrative, and what are its limits?
Read the worked answer
A 40 per cent fall in municipal salt sales is a behavioural measure rather than a statement of opinion. People either bought the depot's salt or did not, and the clerk recording it had no stake in the movement's reputation. It measures the boycott's effect at the point of purchase and can be compared across months and towns.
Its limits are real. The collector himself offers a rival explanation - the price of imported salt - so the fall may be economic, not political; a good answer tests whether the price actually moved that month. The figure is aggregate: it cannot say whether the buyers were merchants, weavers or households, nor whether they abstained from conviction or from fear. Sales at one depot miss salt bought elsewhere, including contraband and village-made salt, so a boycott could depress depot sales while total consumption stayed flat.
The right use is triangulation. Narrative sources tell you what people meant to do; the sales figure tells you whether the intention showed up in behaviour; the shop closure data connects the two. Where all three point the same way, the claim is safe. Where they diverge, the divergence is itself the historical finding, and the essay should say so rather than pick the most flattering source.