Mustard Oil Against a National Brand
Tripti Agro sells mustard oil in six districts of north Bihar and holds a 12 per cent share of the packaged segment. Its 1-litre pouch is priced at ₹152. A national brand launched last month at ₹138 with television advertising and a 10 per cent trade scheme. Tripti sells through 400 wholesalers earning a 4 per cent margin, against 7 per cent offered by the national brand; it has never advertised, and its brand recall in a shop survey was 9 per cent. A consumer survey shows 58 per cent of households still buy loose oil on price, 27 per cent buy packaged oil for purity and health, and 15 per cent are hotels buying 15-litre tins. Tripti's annual promotion budget is ₹40 lakh, and its plant can fill pouches only in 1-litre and 5-litre sizes; a 15-litre tin would need a ₹25 lakh capital addition.
1. Segment the market and choose a target segment. Justify why chasing the largest segment would be a strategic error.
Read the worked answer
Three segments are visible, and they are separated by purchase motive, not just by price.
- Price-driven loose-oil buyers (58 per cent). They are not in the packaged market at all; reaching them means selling loose oil or cutting price below cost.
- Purity-and-health packaged buyers (27 per cent). They buy packaging, batch codes and a trust claim; the purchase reason is confidence in what is inside the pouch.
- Commercial buyers, mainly hotels (15 per cent). Volume purchase in 15-litre tins, price-sensitive but loyal to consistent supply.
Target: the 27 per cent purity segment, with Tripti's existing 1-litre and 5-litre packs.
Why not the 58 per cent? Because size is not the same as accessibility. Converting loose-oil buyers requires either a price cut Tripti cannot fund or a loose-oil distribution model it does not have, and the national brand can outspend it on any price war. Chasing them also confuses the positioning: a brand cannot be both the cheapest oil and the safest oil. The 15 per cent hotel segment is attractive but blocked by a ₹25 lakh capital requirement and 15-litre capability - a later move once the purity segment funds it.
2. Using the four Ps, recommend how Tripti should spend its ₹40 lakh and respond to the ₹138 launch, keeping the target segment in view.
Read the worked answer
Product. Reinforce the purity promise: batch coding, Agmark certification displayed on the pack, a clear 'kachi ghani' claim, and a 5-litre family pack pushed as better value per litre. Do not launch a 15-litre tin yet - the ₹25 lakh capex is better deferred.
Price. Hold ₹152. A ₹14 cut is a 9.2 per cent reduction on a product whose net margin is unlikely to exceed 8 per cent; matched price means negative margin, and the national brand can sustain losses for longer. Instead defend value per litre through the 5-litre pack.
Place. Raise wholesaler margin from 4 to 6 per cent, still below the national brand's 7, but pair it with a retailer scheme and assured stock availability - the national brand's weakness in small towns is stock-out, not price. Focus on the shops where the 27 per cent actually buy.
Promotion. With ₹40 lakh, television is unaffordable and wasted. Put money into local radio, village haats and melas, painted shop boards, and sampling with local doctors and school teachers - credible voices for a purity claim. Budget roughly half on trade incentives, half on local awareness, and measure recall quarterly against the 9 per cent baseline.
3. The sales head argues: 'Cut the price to ₹138 and we keep our shelf space.' Evaluate this argument using margin arithmetic and competitive reasoning.
Read the worked answer
Arithmetic. At ₹152, a ₹14 cut removes 9.2 per cent of realisation per pouch. If Tripti's net margin on mustard oil is around 6–8 per cent, matching ₹138 wipes out the entire profit - the firm would sell more oil and earn less money. To restore the old profit per pouch it would need a cost reduction or volume increase the plant cannot deliver, since capacity is already constrained to 1-litre and 5-litre filling.
Competitive reasoning. Price is the easiest signal for a rival to copy and the hardest to reverse. Once Tripti teaches its buyers that ₹138 is the fair price, the national brand can drop to ₹130 for one season, and Tripti has no further margin to give. A larger firm with television budgets can fund a price war from other products; Tripti cannot.
What the shelf-space fear misses. Retailers stock brands that sell and that pay them margin. Tripti's defence is availability, a 6 per cent trade margin, and demand pulled by local advertising - not a lower shelf price.
Verdict. Reject the price cut. Hold ₹152, add a 5-litre value pack, and if a fighting price is needed, create a smaller pack at a lower absolute price rather than discounting the flagship.