Two Blocks With Equal Incomes and Unequal Lives
Two adjoining blocks of the same district report almost identical average monthly per capita expenditure - ₹4,050 in Block A and ₹3,950 in Block B. Their social indicators, however, diverge sharply. Block A: literacy 72 per cent, female literacy 61 per cent, infant mortality 52 per 1,000 live births, life expectancy 66 years, and only 46 per cent of children aged 6–14 attending school regularly. Block B: literacy 78 per cent, female literacy 74 per cent, infant mortality 34, life expectancy 71 years, and 81 per cent of children in regular school. Block A has the district hospital and a new bypass; Block B has several small clinics and a government degree college. A newspaper headline declares 'Block A is richer, so it is more developed'. A panchayat member from Block A, who has discretionary funds, wants to build a decorative gate and a statue at the market.
1. Which block shows higher human development? Justify using the three dimensions and the construction of the index.
Read the worked answer
Block B. Human development is assessed on health, education and access to resources, and the HDI combines them as a geometric mean, so a deficit in any one dimension drags the index down and cannot be bought off by the others.
Compare dimension by dimension: health - B is ahead on both indicators (IMR 34 vs 52; life expectancy 71 vs 66). Education - B is ahead on all three (literacy 78 vs 72; female literacy 74 vs 61; regular attendance 81 vs 46). Income - A is ahead by only about 2.5 per cent, which is trivial beside gaps of that size.
So B wins two of three dimensions and loses one narrowly. Under any defensible weighting, B ranks higher.
The deeper judgement: A's hospital and bypass are inputs, not outcomes. Infrastructure only counts once it becomes service - a hospital without staff converts into nothing. B appears to convert a slightly lower income into much better outcomes through many small clinics and a college, which also suggests its expenditure is more evenly distributed. The headline confuses income with capability.
2. Why is average per capita expenditure a poor proxy for development? Set out the argument the student should put to the newspaper.
Read the worked answer
Four linked reasons:
- It is a mean, so it hides distribution. A few high-income households can lift the average while a majority remain poor. Two blocks with the same mean can have completely different poverty counts; the Gini or the share of the bottom 40 per cent is more informative.
- It measures means, not ends. Income is command over goods; development is what people can actually do and be - be healthy, literate, participate. A bypass raises measured expenditure through construction without changing literacy or survival.
- Conversion varies. The same income buys less capability for a disabled person, a girl in a restrictive household, or a family far from a clinic. Money is not equally convertible into wellbeing.
- It misses non-market goods and ignores price differences and volatility - public health, schooling, clean water, security are unpriced, and a bad harvest year can wipe out an average.
This is why HDI, the MPI and the capability approach measure health and education directly. The newspaper's error is a classic one: it treats a means as the end.
3. Advise the panchayat member on how to spend the funds, and state how success should be measured.
Read the worked answer
The gate and statue are prestige spending: they consume funds, produce no capability, and their only advantage is immediate visibility. Since the member's real problem is that benefits from health and education arrive late - after the electoral cycle - the advice should acknowledge that incentive and still redirect it.
Spend instead on:
- Staffing and referral transport at the sub-centre and the hospital, because IMR 52 is a health-system failure, not a household one;
- Regular attendance, the weakest indicator at 46 per cent - this is a flow, so it responds within one to two sessions through monitoring, stipends and functioning mid-day meals;
- Girls' toilets and cycles, to close the 11-point female literacy gap.
Measure success by IMR, attendance and female literacy - not by counting assets built. A plaque on a ward wall listing these three numbers and updating them quarterly gives the member visible credit for invisible work. The reasoning to state explicitly: the indicator that is furthest behind and fastest to move should get the first rupee.