Marking an Unseen Passage: Inference, Context, and Tone
Ms. Kavita is marking the unseen-passage section of a Class XII trial exam. The passage describes how a city removed 1,200 roadside trees for a road-widening project. The municipal commissioner claims 3,000 saplings were planted as 'compensatory' cover, while an ecologist puts sapling survival at 18 per cent. One question asks why the writer calls the loss a 'quiet crisis'. A second asks what 'compensatory' means in this context. A third asks about the writer's tone. A student, Arjun, writes: (i) 'It is a quiet crisis because the trees were cut at night when nobody could see.' (ii) 'Compensatory means something that compensates.' (iii) 'The writer is angry.' The marking scheme awards 2 marks for each answer but does not specify acceptable variation. Ms. Kavita has to decide the marks and, more importantly, what feedback will improve Arjun's next attempt.
1. For each of Arjun's three answers, decide the mark out of 2 and justify the decision using the demands of an unseen-passage question. Do not simply say 'wrong'.
Read the worked answer
- (i) 0/2. The question asks why the writer calls the loss a 'quiet crisis'. Arjun supplies a nocturnal detail that the passage does not contain. A quiet crisis is quiet because it is slow, statistical and undramatic - 1,200 trees lost against a claim of 3,000 saplings - not because it happens at night. The answer invents a cause.
- (ii) 0/2. 'Something that compensates' is circular: it replaces the word with a relative clause. In context, compensatory cover means plantation intended to offset the loss of mature trees. The ecologist's 18 per cent survival figure is what makes the word contestable, so a full-mark answer would note the gap between saplings planted and trees actually replaced.
- (iii) 1/2. 'Angry' is not absurd; the passage is critical. But tone questions need evidence. The contrast between the commissioner's 3,000 and the ecologist's 18 per cent is more ironic than openly angry. Award 1 for a plausible but unsubstantiated tone; 2 would require 'critical', 'ironic' or 'concerned' with a phrase from the passage.
Reasoning: unseen-passage marking rewards what the passage supports, not what the reader feels or assumes.
2. Write the feedback you would give Arjun in no more than 80 words. It should teach transferable reading behaviour rather than simply supply the correct answers.
Read the worked answer
Arjun, before you answer, underline the exact words the question points to. For (i), ask: does the passage say 'night'? If not, do not add it. For (ii), replace the word with a phrase that would fit the sentence but does not repeat it. For tone, choose a word and attach one phrase from the passage as proof. Your tone answer was close; your first two were guesses dressed as facts.
3. One of the three questions is weakly designed for testing inference. Identify it and rewrite it so that it requires inference rather than dictionary recall. Explain your choice.
Read the worked answer
The weak question is (ii), 'What does compensatory mean?' As phrased, it can be answered from the word's root or from a dictionary definition, and Arjun's circular answer exposes that weakness. A better question would be: 'The writer says the saplings are "compensatory" cover. Why does the ecologist's 18 per cent survival figure make the word "compensatory" ironic?' This requires the reader to connect two details - the claimed replacement and the measured survival - and to infer that the word is being used critically. It cannot be answered by defining 'compensatory' alone.