Was the Mughal Demand Heavy? Three Sources and One Number
A student in a Rohtak school is writing a thousand-word essay on agrarian taxation under Akbar. She has three sources: a translated extract from the Ain-i-Akbari listing the jama of a pargana in the Bari Doab; a Persian sanad preserved by a local family and photocopied in a district history; and an excerpt from a European traveller's account describing peasants as 'oppressed beyond belief'. The Ain figure is 42 lakh dams, and a footnote in her translation explains that jama is the assessed demand, not the sum actually collected. The sanad is undated but names a reign-year that could be Akbar's thirtieth or Jahangir's third. The traveller spent eleven months in the region and never left the imperial camp. The essay must answer the question: 'How heavy was the Mughal revenue demand on the peasant?' Her teacher warns her against adding the three figures together.
1. What can and cannot the Ain-i-Akbari tell her about the burden on the peasant?
Read the worked answer
The Ain is a statement of demand, not of burden.
- The 42 lakh dams is the jama, the assessed revenue of the pargana. What cultivators actually paid is hasil, a separate figure; the two diverge because of remission, drought, collection costs and the gap between imperial assessment and what local officials extracted.
- The unit misleads unless converted: dams, rupees and 1590s prices must be turned into a grain equivalent before 'heavy' means anything.
- The Ain is a compiled imperial document, produced under Abul Fazl's direction, describing what the empire believed it was entitled to and how it classified land. It is excellent evidence for administration and for comparison between parganas; it is poor evidence for a single cultivator's household.
So the honest answer is: 'The demand was X dams per unit of assessed land here, against Y in neighbouring parganas; the peasant's burden can only be discussed after comparing this with actual collections and local prices.' The three sources must never be added together - they measure different things.
2. How should she use the traveller's account and the sanad, and what limits must she state for each?
Read the worked answer
The traveller: an outsider with eleven months in the region, without the peasantry's language, dependent on camp rumour and on comparison with Europe for rhetorical effect ('oppressed beyond belief'). Useful for concrete observation - what a village looked like, what was carried, how officials behaved - and for showing how Mughal rule was perceived abroad. Useless as a number and dangerous as a general verdict, because a short stay inside the imperial camp is not a survey.
The sanad: a grant or assignment, so not a typical case. It is used for the form of revenue transactions, the terminology, the chain of officials, and the claims a family chose to preserve. The dating problem must be handled explicitly: imperial reign-years restart with each ruler, so compute both candidates (Akbar's thirtieth, Jahangir's third), then test them against the names and titles of officials and the script. State the result as 'most probably', not as settled.
Rule to apply: use each source for the question it was designed to answer. Where two overlap, agreement is corroboration; disagreement is a finding to be explained, not averaged away.
3. Outline the structure of a stronger essay, showing where each source enters and where the argument must stop.
Read the worked answer
- Define terms in the first paragraph: jama (demand), hasil (collection), and 'burden' (demand relative to produce, i.e. incidence).
- Use one figure properly rather than three loosely: convert 42 lakh dams to rupees and to a grain equivalent using Akbar-era prices, and state the assumed rate.
- Place the pargana in a series: compare its jama per unit of assessed area with two other parganas of the same sarkar.
- Give each source a perspective sentence - imperial compilation, family archive, foreign observer's rhetoric - and say which question each answers.
- State plainly what cannot be concluded: 'these documents allow us to compare assessments, not to measure the tax in a peasant's granary'.
- Conclude with a calibrated claim, e.g. 'the demand in this pargana represented roughly a fifth of assessed produce, but collection shortfalls in this decade mean the actual transfer was lower'.
This scores on method and honesty, which is what extended-writing rubrics reward, rather than on a dramatic verdict. The weakest version of the essay is the one that quotes 42 lakh dams, the sanad and the traveller in a single paragraph as if they proved one point.