Stopwatch on the Registration Counter: A District Hospital's Efficiency Drive
A 620-bed district hospital in a state capital handles 1,100 outpatients a day through six registration counters. A baseline study finds average waiting time of 74 minutes; the accepted task time for registering a patient is 2 minutes, while the observed average is 4 minutes with two long unofficial breaks. A reform unit proposes a Taylorian package: stopwatch time study, standardised counter layout, biometric attendance linked to salary deduction, and a per-token incentive. Six months after rollout, average registration time falls to 2.4 minutes, but record errors rise from 1.8 per cent to 6.5 per cent, sick leave among counter staff rises by 12 percentage points, three experienced clerks seek transfer, and the union alleges machine-like treatment. The Medical Superintendent must decide whether to continue, modify or withdraw the package, and has asked for an explanation grounded in administrative theory rather than opinion.
1. Explain the mixed outcome using Taylor, Herzberg, McGregor and Simon. Why did speed improve while accuracy fell?
Read the worked answer
The result does not show that scientific management failed; it shows that only half of it was applied.
- Taylor. Systematic study of the task and removal of wasted motion is legitimate, and the fall from 4.0 to 2.4 minutes confirms the time study worked. But Taylor also insisted on selection, training, and a guaranteed fair day's work with cooperation. The package took the measurement and dropped the cooperation.
- Metric substitution. Once speed became the only measured and rewarded output, clerks traded accuracy for tokens. Errors rising from 1.8 to 6.5 per cent is a predictable response to a single-metric incentive, not evidence of carelessness. Any per-unit incentive needs a paired quality measure.
- Herzberg. Biometric salary deductions and token payments operate on hygiene factors. Their absence demotivates, but their presence does not motivate. Recognition, responsibility, and the meaning of patient service are motivators the package never touched, which fits rising sick leave and transfer requests among experienced staff.
- McGregor. Continuous biometric surveillance plus piece payment encodes Theory X and is read as such. The three clerks seeking transfer are precisely the experienced staff a Theory Y approach would have consulted.
- Simon. The two-minute standard is a satisficing benchmark from a limited sample, treated as an optimum. Bounded rationality applies to the reform unit as much as to the clerks.
2. As Medical Superintendent, what would you continue, modify and withdraw? Give the reasoning behind each choice.
Read the worked answer
Continue: the time study, the standardised counter layout, queue design, and a published service standard for waiting time. These improve the patient's experience and cost little.
Modify: replace the per-token incentive with a counter-level target that combines throughput and record accuracy, audited on a random sample of, say, 2 per cent of registrations. Keep biometric attendance for payroll integrity but remove the automatic salary deduction for short breaks; short planned relief breaks should be rostered, since six counters cannot run on an assumption of zero absence. Convert the two-minute figure into a reviewable benchmark rather than a punitive standard.
Withdraw: the language and practice of individual piece-rate reward, which is producing the error trade-off and the union grievance.
Process reasoning: the reform unit designed for compliance because it assumed resistance. A short consultation with the clerks would probably have surfaced the accuracy risk before rollout, at almost no cost. Add a monthly review with staff representatives where error rates and waiting times are examined together.
Accountability reasoning: the Medical Superintendent remains answerable for patient records, so a measurable quality check is not optional; but accountability should attach to the counter team and to the supervisor, not only to the individual clerk.