BSEH SS Public Admin study materials
BSEH SS Public Admin study resources

BSEH SS Public Admin: Administrative Thinkers and Theories: Taylor, Fayol, Weber, Simon, Maslow, Herzberg and McGregor

BSEH SS Public Admin · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Administrative Thinkers and Theories: Taylor, Fayol, Weber, Simon, Maslow, Herzberg and McGregor

What the domain tests

This domain tests whether you can match each theorist to a specific concept, era and criticism, and apply the idea to a public organization. Expect matching, short notes and application questions.

Core rules and concepts

  • F.W. Taylor: scientific management; time and motion study; differential piece-rate; functional foremanship; one best way. Criticized for a machine-like view of workers.
  • Henri Fayol: five functions (planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, controlling) and 14 principles, including unity of command, scalar chain and esprit de corps.
  • Max Weber: ideal-type bureaucracy; legal–rational authority; hierarchy, written rules, impersonality, career officials. Criticized as rigid and oligarchic.
  • Herbert Simon: bounded rationality; administrative man satisfices rather than maximizes; fact–value distinction; decision-making is the heart of administration.
  • Abraham Maslow: five-need hierarchy - physiological, safety, social, esteem, self-actualization; lower needs generally precede higher ones.
  • Frederick Herzberg: two-factor theory; hygiene factors (pay, conditions) prevent dissatisfaction, motivators (achievement, recognition, responsibility) create satisfaction.
  • Douglas McGregor: Theory X assumes workers dislike work and need control; Theory Y assumes commitment, self-direction and responsibility.

Worked example

A revenue office has competitive pay but low initiative. A Taylorist fix would tighten supervision and incentives; a Herzberg reading says pay is only hygiene, so the office should add recognition, meaningful task design and responsibility. McGregor would shift assumptions from Theory X control to Theory Y participation. Simon would caution that officials satisfice under workload, so process redesign matters more than assuming perfect optimization.

Traps that cost marks

Fayol and Taylor are not interchangeable: Fayol is administrative/process theory, Taylor is shop-floor scientific management. Maslow's hierarchy is not a validated law. Theory X and Y are managerial assumptions, not personality types. Weber described an ideal type, not a recommendation.