The Boy Who Stopped Eating at School
Suresh is a Class X student in a residential-cum-day school attached to a higher secondary institution. Over two months his marks have fallen from around 72 per cent to 48 per cent, spread evenly across subjects, including ones he used to enjoy. He now sits alone at the back during the lunch break, though teachers report no disruption and no complaints from him. Twice this month he has arrived without lunch and declined food offered by classmates. His class teacher noticed a scabbed cut on his forearm when he rolled up his sleeves in the science laboratory and a fading bruise near his ear. When asked, he said he "banged into a door" and changed the subject. His attendance is intact, but he now leaves immediately after the last period. A phone call to the home reached his mother, who said he works at a shop in the evening to help the family and that his studies are "his own responsibility". She also said the family does not want "school people interfering". The school has no counsellor; the head teacher is the only person with a private room.
1. What type of problem is this likely to be, and how should the teacher avoid premature diagnosis while still acting?
Read the worked answer
The correct stance is alert without conclusion.
Several features raise concern: a uniform drop across subjects (general rather than subject-specific difficulty), withdrawal from peers, loss of appetite or food security, unexplained injuries, and a marked change in departure behaviour. Those are consistent with distress at home, with work burden, or with both, and they are also consistent with other explanations - illness, a bereavement, or a situation at the shop. The teacher is not qualified to name a cause, and naming one too early is harmful: it can trigger parental resistance, alarm the child, or send the case down the wrong referral route.
But uncertainty does not license inaction. There are two distinct duties here. The first is to gather observable facts: dates of the marks decline, the written record of the missed lunches, the two injuries with dates and what was said, and the mother's exact words. The second is to act on the safety question separately from the cause question. Unexplained injuries on a minor, in a school setting, must be recorded and escalated through the head teacher to the child protection system, whatever the cause turns out to be.
So: no diagnosis in the staffroom; documentation and escalation instead, and direct support to the student in parallel.
2. The mother has said the school should not interfere. What can the teacher do, and what must he do regardless of her objection?
Read the worked answer
Separate the two registers of action.
What can be done with the family: the teacher can explain, in plain terms and without accusation, what the school has observed - marks, the skipped lunches, the injuries - and ask rather than tell: what has changed at home, what hours does the shop work involve, what would help. Offer something concrete: a school lunch arrangement, a study slot before the evening shift, a referral to a free helpline or block-level counselling service. Confidentiality applies here - the mother's account of the family should not circulate in the staffroom.
What must be done regardless: confidentiality about a parent's wishes does not extend to a child's physical safety. Documented injuries in a minor must be reported through the head teacher to the appropriate child protection authority; that is a legal duty, not a discretionary judgement, and a parent's consent is not the gate. Similarly, the school cannot accept a situation in which a child is arriving without food; the midday meal or a discreet alternative should be arranged without requiring the mother's agreement.
State the limits to the family honestly: what the school will keep private, and what it is obliged to report. Be explicit that the boy himself will be told what is happening and why, so that he is not left imagining that the adults are talking about him.
3. How should the teacher approach Suresh directly, given that the school has no counsellor?
Read the worked answer
The setting and the opening matter more than the technique.
Setting: a private room, a neutral time, no audience, and no summons in front of classmates. The head teacher's room, borrowed for twenty minutes, is enough; a corridor is not.
Opening: describe, don't interpret. "I noticed you scored 48 this time when you were at 72, and I noticed you have been leaving straight after class. I'm not in trouble with you - I want to know how things are." Avoid "Why are you not eating?" - it invites denial. Ask about his week, his job, his sleep.
Listening: let silences stay. Do not fill them with theories about the shop or the family. If he mentions the injuries, do not press for details in a way that makes him responsible for proving them.
Honesty about limits: say that this conversation is not entirely private if he is being hurt, and explain what will happen next before it happens. A child who discovers later that the conversation was reported feels betrayed; a child who is told feels that he was taken seriously.
Closing with something concrete: a plan for lunch, a study slot, a named adult he can go to, and a next meeting date.
For the teacher: this is not therapy. He should record what was said, share it with the head teacher on a need-to-know basis, and seek a professional referral rather than continue alone.