CHSE Odisha Voc. Microbiology & Serology study materials
CHSE Odisha Voc. Microbiology & Serology study resources

Coliform Detection and Post-Treatment Regrowth at a Packaged Water Plant

CHSE Odisha Voc. Microbiology & Serology · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Coliform Detection and Post-Treatment Regrowth at a Packaged Water Plant

A packaged drinking water plant supplies 20,000-litre batches from a borewell. Treatment is sand filtration, reverse osmosis, ultraviolet disinfection, and no chlorination. On 3 June, a 100 mL sample from the finished-water tank gave 32 blue colonies on m-Endo agar after membrane filtration at 35 °C; 4 colonies were typical metallic-sheen coliforms and were confirmed as Escherichia coli by indole, citrate, and lactose fermentation tests. Free chlorine residual is 0.0 mg/L. On 8 June, a school reports that water from a 5-litre transparent dispenser, filled at the plant and kept in sunlight for three days, is cloudy and smells musty; a heterotrophic plate count on R2A agar is 8 × 10^4 CFU/mL. The plant manager argues that the UV lamp is 'on' and the first result is laboratory contamination. The next batch is due for dispatch tomorrow.

1. Interpret the two microbiological results. Is the first result likely to be laboratory contamination?

Read the worked answer

The first result is not automatically laboratory contamination. The m-Endo plate grew 32 blue colonies from 100 mL, and 4 typical metallic-sheen colonies were confirmed as E. coli. That is a positive finished-water result, not a minor deviation: coliforms and E. coli should be absent from treated drinking water.

Laboratory contamination should still be excluded by examining the negative control, the filtration apparatus, the agar, and a repeat sample from the same batch and from the source. However, the result is plausible because the plant has no residual disinfectant, UV provides no lasting protection, and biofilm can form downstream in tanks, lines, and dispensers.

The second result is different but consistent with a process problem. An heterotrophic plate count of 8 × 10^4 CFU/mL after three days in a transparent dispenser exposed to sunlight indicates regrowth and biofilm sloughing, not necessarily the same E. coli strain. Cloudiness and a musty odour support microbial growth in the dispenser.

Therefore, treat both as signals of inadequate process control until repeat sampling proves otherwise.

2. What immediate corrective actions and release criteria should the plant apply before dispatching tomorrow's batch?

Read the worked answer

Immediate actions:

  • Hold the affected batch and any water already filled from the same tank; do not dispatch until microbiological clearance is obtained.
  • Clean and sanitise the finished-water tank, transfer lines, filling heads, and dispensers. Dismantle and clean the dispenser valve and cap area, where biofilm accumulates.
  • Inspect and replace the UV lamp and clean the quartz sleeve. Verify UV intensity or dose, not merely that the lamp is 'on'. Check lamp hours and ballast function.
  • Check RO membrane integrity and sanitise the RO train if required. Sand filters and carbon units can seed bacteria if not backwashed and sanitised.
  • If chlorination is part of the approved process, establish a measurable free residual at filling; if not, rely on validated UV, filtration, and strict hygiene.

Release criteria:

  • E. coli absent in 100 mL and total coliforms absent in 100 mL on repeat samples from the batch and from the point of filling.
  • Heterotrophic plate count within the plant's validated process limit.
  • UV dose or intensity within specification and no residual disinfectant problem.
  • No musty odour or visible turbidity.

Release should require a documented review, not a verbal assurance from the operator.

3. What root-cause and HACCP monitoring changes would prevent recurrence?

Read the worked answer

Root causes include ineffective UV disinfection, lack of residual protection, biofilm in tanks and dispensers, and inadequate cleaning of returned or reused containers. Sunlight exposure of a transparent dispenser accelerates regrowth.

HACCP changes:

  • Make UV disinfection a validated critical control point with continuous monitoring of UV intensity or calculated dose, lamp hours, and sleeve cleanliness. Set a critical limit and a corrective action for deviation.
  • Add turbidity and differential-pressure monitoring for the RO and filters; turbidity shields microorganisms from UV.
  • Schedule and record sanitisation of tanks, lines, filling heads, and dispensers, with verification by swabs or rinse water counts.
  • Use single-use or properly sanitised dispensers; instruct customers to keep water cool and out of sunlight, and to clean dispensers regularly.
  • Increase finished-product sampling frequency and include source water, post-RO water, and point-of-fill samples to locate the contamination step.
  • Train staff that a visible lamp is not evidence of UV disinfection.

Trend the data; a single passing result after cleaning does not prove the process is under control.