CUET Agriculture study materials
CUET Agriculture study resources

Tomato marketing choice with a loan deadline

CUET Agriculture · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Tomato marketing choice with a loan deadline

A farmer harvests 900 kg of tomato in a single week. The local mandi price is ₹8/kg, but commission and transport reduce net realisation to ₹5.50/kg. A nearby cooperative has offered to buy at ₹7/kg if he grades and delivers in plastic crates; grading costs ₹0.80/kg and crates cost ₹1,200 (reusable for 3 seasons). A trader offers ₹4/kg at the farm gate for the whole lot. Cold storage is 40 km away, costs ₹2/kg for up to 10 days, and prices are expected to rise to ₹11/kg after 10 days, but 15% spoilage is likely. The farmer needs cash within a week for loan repayment.

1. Compare net returns from the four options (mandi, cooperative, trader, cold storage) and recommend one, considering cash flow and risk.

Read the worked answer

Mandi: 900 × ₹5.50 = ₹4,950, cash immediately, but he bears transport and commission.

Cooperative: gross 900 × ₹7 = ₹6,300. Grading = 900 × ₹0.80 = ₹720. Crate cost per season = ₹1,200/3 = ₹400. Net = 6,300 - 720 - 400 = ₹5,180. Payment is within days if he grades and delivers; crate purchase is an upfront cost.

Trader at farm gate: 900 × ₹4 = ₹3,600, no cost, immediate cash, but the lowest return.

Cold storage: 15% spoilage leaves 900 × 0.85 = 765 kg saleable. Gross at ₹11/kg = ₹8,415. Storage = 900 × ₹2 = ₹1,800. Transport is extra; even ignoring it, net is about ₹6,615. But cash comes after 10 days, misses the loan deadline, and the ₹11 price is only an expectation. Spoilage could exceed 15%, and quality loss is likely.

Recommendation: the cooperative is the best aligned choice. It returns ₹5,180, slightly above the mandi and well above the trader, and pays within a week. Cold storage has the highest expected return but conflicts with the loan deadline and carries price and spoilage risk. If the loan penalty is severe, the mandi is the safe fallback; if he has a day's labour for grading and can buy crates, the cooperative is better.

2. What non-price factors should the farmer weigh, and how could he reduce risk if he chooses cold storage?

Read the worked answer

Non-price factors include the timing of cash needs, the loan repayment penalty, perishability, labour for grading, crate storage and reuse, transport reliability, buyer trust, market information, and the risk of a price fall or spoilage. The cooperative requires grading and delivery, which may compete with other farm work; the trader requires nothing but pays least. The mandi has immediate cash but volatile daily prices. Cold storage ties up cash and produce for 10 days and depends on a forecast.

If he nevertheless chooses cold storage, reduce risk by:

  • Storing only sound, blemish-free fruit and grading out damaged tomatoes first.
  • Pre-arranging a buyer or a floor price before storage, rather than speculating.
  • Using ventilated crates and maintaining the correct temperature; checking for decay every 2 days.
  • Selling in two lots, for example half after 5 days and half after 10 days, to spread price risk.
  • Keeping enough cash to repay the loan from another source or negotiating a short extension.
  • Insuring the stored produce if a suitable policy is available.

Because the loan is due within a week, cold storage is poorly matched to his cash flow. A better risk-reduction step is to accept the cooperative price for most of the lot and sell a small graded portion later if a buyer appears.