DBT-BET study materials
DBT-BET study resources

Material Selection for a Bruxing Patient With Thin Anterior Abutments

DBT-BET · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Material Selection for a Bruxing Patient With Thin Anterior Abutments

A 42-year-old patient needs a 3-unit fixed partial denture replacing the maxillary right central incisor. The abutments are the right lateral incisor and the left central incisor. The dentist has prepared the abutments with 0.8 mm axial reduction and 1.2 mm incisal clearance. The patient has bruxism, wear facets, and reports clenching. The lab is asked to choose between monolithic lithium disilicate and monolithic zirconia. The prescription says 'tooth-colored, high strength, minimal thickness.' The dentist wants to cement with adhesive resin. The lab has a 5-axis mill and can sinter zirconia in-house. The patient is unhappy with the shade match of a previous PFM and wants no metal. The lab's material guide states lithium disilicate minimum incisal thickness 1.5 mm and axial 1.0 mm; monolithic zirconia minimum 1.0 mm incisal and 0.8 mm axial. The interproximal connector space is 3.0 mm buccolingually at the lateral incisor and 3.2 mm at the central incisor. The lab must decide by tomorrow to meet the schedule.

1. Which material should the lab recommend, and what calculations support that recommendation?

Read the worked answer

Calculation:

  • Lithium disilicate requires 1.5 mm incisal and 1.0 mm axial. The preparation has 1.2 mm incisal and 0.8 mm axial, so it is 0.3 mm and 0.2 mm short, respectively. It cannot be used without re-preparation.
  • Monolithic zirconia requires 1.0 mm incisal and 0.8 mm axial. The preparation has 1.2 mm incisal (0.2 mm excess) and 0.8 mm axial (exactly at the minimum). It meets the material guide.

Recommendation: Recommend monolithic zirconia, not lithium disilicate. The axial reduction is at the lower limit, so the margin design and cementation must be controlled; do not reduce the axial wall further. If the dentist insists on lithium disilicate, the abutments must be re-prepared to at least 1.5 mm incisal and 1.0 mm axial, or the material choice must change.

2. Evaluate the connector dimensions for a 3-unit anterior zirconia FPD and describe cementation considerations.

Read the worked answer

Connector check: For a 3-unit anterior zirconia FPD, the connector should have a cross-sectional area of about 12 mm². With 3.0 mm buccolingual space at the lateral incisor, an occlusogingival height of at least 4.0 mm gives 12.0 mm²; at the central incisor, 3.2 mm x 4.0 mm gives 12.8 mm². If the occlusogingival height is less than 4.0 mm, the connector is undersized and the design should be revised before milling.

Cementation: Because the axial reduction is only 0.8 mm, use a validated adhesive protocol for zirconia: clean the intaglio, avoid phosphoric-acid etching of the zirconia surface, apply an MDP-containing primer where indicated, and use an adhesive resin cement with good film thickness control. Verify marginal fit and isolation; a thin axial wall plus poor cementation increases the risk of debonding and fracture.