IICA Independent Director study materials
IICA Independent Director study resources

IICA Independent Director: Corporate Governance and Board Excellence

IICA Independent Director · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Corporate Governance and Board Excellence

Corporate Governance and Board Excellence

This domain tests board architecture and process: composition and independence, meetings and quorum, committees, evaluation, related-party oversight and the standard of care expected of an independent director.

Core rules

  • Section 149(4): every listed public company must have at least one-third of its board as independent directors.
  • SEBI LODR Regulation 17 tightens this: at least one-third independent where the chairperson is non-executive, but at least one-half where the chairperson is executive or a promoter. The top 1,000 listed entities must have at least one independent woman director.
  • Regulation 17A caps independent directorships at seven listed companies; a whole-time director moving to an independent role in the same company needs a one-year cooling-off.
  • Section 173: four board meetings a year with a gap not exceeding 120 days. Independent directors meet separately at least once a year under Schedule IV.
  • Committees: Audit (Section 177), Nomination and Remuneration (Section 178), Stakeholders' Relationship and CSR (Section 135), with independent-majority requirements in listed companies.
  • Section 178(2) and Schedule IV require annual evaluation of the board, its committees and individual directors, including a review by independent directors of the chairperson and non-independent directors.

Worked example

A listed company has nine directors and an executive chairperson who is also a promoter. Under LODR 17(1)(b) at least half must be independent, so five seats (4.5 rounded up). A board retaining only three independent directors breaches the LODR even though it satisfies the one-third rule in Section 149(4); the stricter standard governs.

Traps

  • Applying the one-third test when the chairperson is executive.
  • Confusing 'non-executive' with 'independent' - independence requires every Section 149(6) test to be met.
  • Treating evaluation as a formality; the outcome must be disclosed in the board's report under Section 134(3)(p).
  • Reading Section 149(12) as blanket immunity - it covers only acts done diligently and with knowledge through board processes.