III IC-78 study materials
III IC-78 study resources

Reinstatement Value Clause, Average and the Whole-Property Rule

III IC-78 · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Reinstatement Value Clause, Average and the Whole-Property Rule

A pharmaceutical formulation plant in Baddi insured its building, plant and machinery, and stock under a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy with the Reinstatement Value Clause attached, for a total sum insured of Rs 12.00 crore, of which Rs 8.00 crore was allotted to building and plant and machinery and Rs 4.00 crore to stock. When the proposal was placed, the insured's valuer put the reinstatement cost of building and machinery at Rs 10.50 crore. A fire on 14 February damaged two granulation lines. The surveyor assessed the cost of reinstating the damaged machinery at Rs 3.00 crore, with no salvage. She also found that escalation in structural steel and imported component prices had pushed the reinstatement cost of the entire building and machinery to Rs 16.00 crore, and that stock at risk on the date of fire was Rs 4.60 crore. The insured has already placed a purchase order and intends to reinstate. The machinery section carries a policy excess of Rs 5 lakh.

1. Compute the amount payable for the machinery damage, showing each step, and state what would change if the insured decided not to reinstate.

Read the worked answer

Step 1 – which value governs. Under the Reinstatement Value Clause the measure of indemnity is the cost of reinstating the property to its pre-loss condition, but the clause does not displace the average condition. Average is tested by comparing the sum insured with the reinstatement value of the whole property covered by that section at the date of loss - not the value of the damaged item alone, and not the figure stated in the proposal.

Step 2 – average factor. Sum insured for building and machinery = Rs 8.00 crore; reinstatement value of the entire building and machinery = Rs 16.00 crore. Factor = 8.00 / 16.00 = 0.50.

Step 3 – application. Reinstatement cost of the damaged machinery Rs 3.00 crore × 0.50 = Rs 1.50 crore; less policy excess Rs 0.05 crore = Rs 1.45 crore.

If the insured does not reinstate within 12 months (or such longer period as the insurer allows in writing), the Reinstatement Value Clause ceases to apply and the loss is settled on the depreciated/market-value basis. Average is then tested against the depreciated value of the whole property, and the claim falls far below Rs 1.45 crore. The insured cannot elect the more favourable basis after seeing the figures.

Stock is always settled on market value; Rs 4.60 crore at risk against Rs 4.00 crore insured means any stock loss would also be averaged. Note also that the Rs 1.45 crore allowed here does not restore the sum insured for a later fire in the same year.

2. Advise the insured on how the cover should be restructured to avoid a repeat, naming specific clauses and explaining what each achieves.

Read the worked answer

Present the risk as it should have been placed, tying each element to the failure in this claim:

  • Correct sum insured. Value building and plant at current reinstatement cost (Rs 16.00 crore here) with realistic escalation; revalue every two to three years. The stale Rs 10.50 crore valuation, not the rate, produced the shortfall.
  • Reinstatement of Value (automatic restoration) clause. Restores the sum insured after a loss so a second fire in the same policy year is not paid on a depleted sum insured. It does not cure under-insurance at the date of the first loss.
  • Escalation clause (for example 10% per annum, or a fixed 25% on building). Automatically increases the sum insured during the policy period to track inflation; premium is charged on the increased amount and average is tested against the escalated figure.
  • Cumulative Sum Insured clause where more than one loss in a year is a realistic exposure.
  • Stock. Do not assume reinstatement values apply to stock. Declare peak stock realistically; use a stock floater with per-location limits, or a declaration policy where levels swing widely.
  • Disclosure. Confirm the valuation basis to the underwriter in writing and review sums insured at every renewal against a fresh valuation, not against last year's figure plus a guess.