III IC-90 study materials
III IC-90 study resources

Broker Asked to Misclassify Roofers and Omit a Prior Loss

III IC-90 · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Broker Asked to Misclassify Roofers and Omit a Prior Loss

A commercial insurance broker handles a roofing contractor with $900,000 annual payroll, 14 field employees, and an annual package premium of $18,000. The owner asks the broker to reclassify six roofers as clerical on the renewal application, saying it would cut premium by about $7,200 and that everyone does it. The broker knows those six work on roofs daily. The agency agreement requires complete and accurate submissions and prohibits binding coverage on known misstatements. The client also mentions a 2022 fall from a ladder that was paid by the prior insurer but not listed on the loss run the broker received. The renewal is due in nine days. The client says that if the broker refuses, he will move the account to a competitor who won't ask questions.

1. What must the broker do before submitting the renewal?

Read the worked answer

The broker must submit accurate information. Classify employees by their actual duties, not by the premium result. Six roofers cannot be shown as clerical because the broker knows they work on roofs. Correct the payroll allocation and ask the insurer how it wants the exposure described. Separately resolve the missing 2022 ladder fall: obtain the claim details, ask the client for authorization, and disclose the loss or explain the discrepancy to the insurer before binding. Advise the client in writing that material misrepresentation can lead to rescission, denial of a claim, or fraud allegations, and that the broker cannot participate. Document the advice and the client's instructions. Do not let the nine-day deadline justify a false submission. If the client refuses to correct the application, the broker should decline to submit it and should not bind coverage on the known misstatement. The duty of good faith runs to the insurer as well as the client.

2. May the broker bind the account if the client insists on the clerical classification?

Read the worked answer

No. Binding on a known material misstatement would breach the agency agreement and the broker's duty to the insurer, and it would expose the agency to errors-and-omissions claims and potential fraud allegations. The client's threat to move the account does not change that. The broker should explain the alternatives: correct the classification and accept the higher premium, adjust deductibles or payment terms, or seek another market with full disclosure. If the client still insists, the broker should decline to act on the renewal and document the refusal. The broker should not simply submit the application and hope the insurer does not notice. That would convert a client-instruction problem into a professional liability problem. Notify the agency principal or compliance officer if the client pressures the broker or if a prior submission may already be inaccurate.

3. What if the broker discovers that last year's application already contained the same misclassification?

Read the worked answer

Treat it as a current problem, not a historical one. First preserve the file: the application, emails, notes, and the client's instructions. Determine whether the misclassification was a clerical error, an innocent mistake, or a knowing misstatement. Correct the current renewal regardless. Then consider whether the insurer must be notified of the prior inaccuracy, because it may affect the policy's validity or a pending claim. Escalate internally to the agency principal and the errors-and-omissions insurer. Do not conceal the issue or rewrite the file. If coverage was obtained on false information, the insurer may rescind or deny, and the client needs independent legal advice. The broker should not admit liability to the client, but should cooperate honestly with the insurer and the E&O carrier. Document the timeline and the corrective steps.