Open Cover, Late Declaration and Certificate
An Indian cotton exporter has an open cover with an insurer for all shipments CIF, ICC(B), maximum USD 2 million per vessel, declarations to be made within 7 days of the bill of lading. On 3 March, 420 bales of cotton were loaded at Mundra for Chittagong, B/L dated 3 March. The exporter's clerk declared the shipment on 19 March, after the vessel had encountered heavy weather; the insurer's certificate was issued on 20 March showing ICC(B) and warehouse-to-warehouse. The cargo was found wet and stained at Chittagong on 28 March. The survey attributes damage to fresh water entering through a hatch cover that was improperly secured before departure, and to 10 days' storage in an open shed at Chittagong. The insured says the certificate is conclusive evidence of cover and demands USD 310,000. The open cover contains a held-covered clause at a premium to be arranged and a due-diligence condition. The vessel's hatch cover was found with two missing cleats and a torn tarpaulin.
1. Is the late declaration fatal to cover, and what is the status of the certificate issued after the loss? Explain the held-covered clause and any misrepresentation issue.
Read the worked answer
The certificate is not the contract; it is evidence of the open cover. The open cover required declaration within 7 days. A declaration on 19 March for a 3 March B/L is late. That does not automatically void cover if the open cover has a held-covered clause and the insured acted in good faith. The key question is whether the insured knew of the loss when declaring. If the clerk declared after the vessel had met heavy weather but before damage was known, the insurer can charge additional premium under held covered but should not avoid for mere lateness. If the insured deliberately withheld known damage, that is a misrepresentation and may entitle the insurer to avoid. The certificate issued on 20 March cannot create retrospective cover beyond the open cover. It states ICC(B), so the insured cannot later claim ICC(A). The insurer should reserve rights, obtain the declaration log and emails, and check the premium. Do not backdate the declaration or certificate.
2. Assess coverage under ICC(B) for the hatch-water damage and the open-shed storage, and explain how you would apportion the claim.
Read the worked answer
Under ICC(B), the named perils include entry of sea, lake or river water into the vessel or container, and GA sacrifice, but not ordinary rain or fresh water. The survey attributes damage to fresh water through an improperly secured hatch and to open-shed storage. Fresh water or rain damage is not a named ICC(B) peril unless it can be shown to be sea, lake or river water or to flow from a covered event such as heavy weather. The improper securing before departure may be unseaworthiness; because the insured was not privy, the unseaworthiness exclusion does not defeat the cargo claim, but the insurer may pay and subrogate against the carrier.
The open-shed storage after discharge: warehouse-to-warehouse cover continues in the ordinary course of transit, but delay or storage outside the ordinary course can take the loss outside cover. The insured must prove which damage occurred when and from what water. Apportion by bundle, salinity test and storage dates. The insurer likely pays only the sea-water portion, if any, and rejects the fresh-water/rain and post-discharge storage portion. The late declaration affects premium, not the physical coverage analysis.